Subscribe to New Scientist
One Per Cent: A New Scientist Blog

FBI releases plans to monitor social networks

Jim Giles, consultant

134367529.jpg(Image: Patrick George/Ikon Images/Getty)

The US Federal Bureau of Investigation has quietly released details of plans to continuously monitor the global output of Facebook, Twitter and other social networks, offering a rare glimpse into an activity that the FBI and other government agencies are reluctant to discuss publicly. The plans show that the bureau believes it can use information pulled from social media sites to better respond to crises, and maybe even to foresee them.

The information comes from a document released on 19 January looking for companies who might want to build a monitoring system for the FBI. It spells out what the bureau wants from such a system and invites potential contractors to reply by 10 February.

The bureau's wish list calls for the system to be able to automatically search "publicly available" material from Facebook, Twitter and other social media sites for keywords relating to terrorism, surveillance operations, online crime and other FBI missions. Agents would be alerted if the searches produce evidence of "breaking events, incidents, and emerging threats".

Agents will have the option of displaying the tweets and other material captured by the system on a map, to which they can add layers of other data, including the locations of US embassies and military installations, details of previous terrorist attacks and the output from local traffic cameras.

The document suggests that the bureau wants to use social media to target specific users or groups of users. It notes that agents need to "locate bad actors...and analyze their movements, vulnerabilities, limitations, and possible adverse actions". It also states that the bureau will use social media to create "pattern-of-life matrices" -- presumably logs of targets' daily routines -- that will aid law enforcement in planning operations.

The use of the term "publicly available" suggests that Facebook and Twitter may be able to exempt themselves from the monitoring by making their posts private. But the desire of the US government to watch everyone may still have an unwelcome impact, warns Jennifer Lynch at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a San Francisco-based advocacy group.

Lynch says that many people post to social media in the expectation that only their friends and followers are reading, which gives them "the sense of freedom to say what they want without worrying too much about recourse," says Lynch. "But these tools that mine open source data and presumably store it for a very long time, do away with that kind of privacy. I worry about the effect of that on free speech in the US".

The document also suggests that the FBI thinks it can use social media to peer into the future. It notes that agents need to use social media to "[p]redict likely developments in the situation or future actions taken by bad actors (by conducting, [sic] trend, pattern, association, and timeline analysis)".

The bureau declined to immediately comment on how this analysis might work, or on any other aspect of the document, but the idea of turning agents into digital soothsayers is plausible: researchers working at Facebook and in academia have shown that social media can be used to infer many things about an individual, including the existence of friendships that are not declared on social networking sites and the location of users who have not revealed where they are based.
Facebook iconDigg iconDelicious iconStumbleUpon iconTwitter iconTechnorati iconReddit iconAddThis icon
Subscribe to New Scientist Magazine

Post a comment

Sign in to comment, or comment anonymously.

9 Comments

Honestly, the Governing powers should never be allowed to take the aggressive stance against it's Citizens. History shows us that whenever Governing powers do so, their Citizens become the victims of Oppression. Our Governement has already taken the same steps that lead to it evolving into an Oppressive Regime, having asserted an aggressive stance against their own citizens and nullifying rights to achieve their goals. It's become the Governing Powers vs. The People, our forefathers are writhing in their graves.

 

Honestly, the Governing powers should never be allowed to take the aggressive stance against it's Citizens. History shows us that whenever Governing powers do so, their Citizens become the victims of Oppression. Our Governement has already taken the same steps that lead to it evolving into an Oppressive Regime, having asserted an aggressive stance against their own citizens and nullifying rights to achieve their goals. It's become the Governing Powers vs. The People, our forefathers are writhing in their graves.

 

"Lynch says that many people post to social media in the expectation that only their friends and followers are reading"

Well, they shouldn't, regardless of what the FBI may be doing.

 

China/Iran would be very glad that the FBI is developing tools to monitor Facebook and other similar social networking sites for people which may habour dissidence sentiments.

Let it be on record that I have always agreed with whatever the government says. I have never been anti establishment. Big brother knows best. I don't think. I follow. I am a happy follower.

 

Hello - is it only me who wonders about the FBI etc., advertising publicly for programs/people like this?
With all their dough and resources, they need to advertise for help???

 

Those damned americans! Will they ever stay home and shut the hell up? Will they ever stop trying to control everyone in that lonely world???!!!

 

I think that the FBI and America in general need to remember they are not policing the world they can make and enforce laws in America. These social networks span the world and I am quite sure we are capable of looking after ourselves we don't need the Americans poking their bloody noses in.

 

I don't see why people are so upset. The ENTIRE purpose of the site is to aggregate MASSIVE amounts of information. That's its job, now the state is saying it wants to use it for good. It was inevitable and a good decision by them, The PROBLEM is people using it given that its clear that its just a car crash waiting to happen. But then they don't care in practise, just in theory. Its called resolve. Facebook is 'a bad thing' by its very definition. There is a reason why indian tribes believe photos steal your soul - soon its not going to appear silly to people who have no refined ideas on what a soul/self might actually be (clue not a religious object)

 

@Mathieu and Anon
If you feel so strongly about the Americans, scanning THEIR social networks for information YOU put there, and made public, then take your business elsewhere. Just a thought

 
Next post
Twitter Follow us
Twitter updates
© Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.