What effect do surfactants have on RP-HPLC separations?
The separation on a C18
column of the protein sample containing SDS was much worse (Fig. 1B) than
the separation of the protein sample without SDS (Fig. 1A). Subsequent
chromatography of the sample without SDS, however, showed no deterioration
(Fig. 1C), confirming that the SDS was removed in the gradient and did
not harm the column or affect subsequent separations.
Results on a C4 column showed parallel but slightly better results than those obtained on the C18 column (Figure 2). The presence of SDS in the protein sample affected the chromatography (Fig. 2B), however the effect was less than on the C18 column (compare with Fig. 2A). The SDS was removed in the gradient and did not affect the column or subsequent separations (Fig. 2C).
Figure 1
Effect of surfactants on C18 RP-HPLC of polypeptides Surfactants affect Conditions: |
Figure 2
Effect of surfactants on C4 RP-HPLC of polypeptides Surfactants affects chromatography
(B) Conditions: |
Peptide separations are seriously affected by the presence of surfactant. Even trace amounts of SDS in a peptide sample or protein digest can reduce separation efficiency significantly. Peptide maps of a protein digest containing small amounts of SDS showed that even small amounts of SDS affected the digest separation and higher amounts virtually destroyed resolution (Figure 3).
Figure 3
Effect of surfactants on peptide map The presence of even trace amounts
of SDS Conditions: |
Although surfactants usually degrade RP-HPLC peptide separations, the use of octylglucoside, urea and guanidine in the eluent have produced beneficial results in some cases.
Surfactants usually degrade RP-HPLC polypeptide separations, however they do not harm the column. If surfactants are present in the sample, we recommend using a C4 reversed-phase column or removing the surfactant prior to chromatography.