Talks

Jonathan Drori: The beautiful tricks of flowers

Filmed May 2011 • Posted Jul 2011TEDSalon London Spring 2011

Click on any phrase to play the video at that point.

Close
Loading...

Do you know how many species of flowering plants there are? There are a quarter of a million -- at least those are the ones we know about -- a quarter of a million species of flowering plants. And flowers are a real bugger. They're really difficult for plants to produce. They take an enormous amount of energy and a lot of resources. Why would they go to that bother? And the answer of course, like so many things in the world, is sex. I know what's on your mind when you're looking at these pictures. And the reason that sexual reproduction is so important -- there are lots of other things that plants can do to reproduce. You can take cuttings; they can sort of have sex with themselves; they can pollinate themselves. But they really need to spread their genes to mix with other genes so that they can adapt to environmental niches. Evolution works that way.

Now the way that plants transmit that information is through pollen. Some of you may have seen some of these pictures before. As I say, every home should have a scanning electron microscope to be able to see these. And there is as many different kinds of pollen as there are flowering plants. And that's actually rather useful for forensics and so on. Most pollen that causes hay fever for us is from plants that use the wind to disseminate the pollen, and that's a very inefficient process, which is why it gets up our noses so much. Because you have to chuck out masses and masses of it, hoping that your sex cells, your male sex cells, which are held within the pollen, will somehow reach another flower just by chance. So all the grasses, which means all of the cereal crops, and most of the trees have wind-borne pollen. But most species actually use insects to do their bidding, and that's more intelligent in a way, because the pollen, they don't need so much of it. The insects and other species can take the pollen, transfer it directly to where it's required.

So we're aware, obviously, of the relationship between insects and plants. There's a symbiotic relationship there, whether it's flies or birds or bees, they're getting something in return, and that something in return is generally nectar. Sometimes that symbiosis has led to wonderful adaptations -- the hummingbird hawk-moth is beautiful in its adaptation. The plant gets something, and the hawk-moth spreads the pollen somewhere else. Plants have evolved to create little landing strips here and there for bees that might have lost their way. There are markings on many plants that look like other insects. These are the anthers of a lily, cleverly done so that when the unsuspecting insect lands on it, the anther flips up and whops it on the back with a great load of pollen that it then goes to another plant with. And there's an orchid that might look to you as if it's got jaws, and in a way, it has; it forces the insect to crawl out, getting covered in pollen that it takes somewhere else.

Orchids: there are 20,000, at least, species of orchids -- amazingly, amazingly diverse. And they get up to all sorts of tricks. They have to try and attract pollinators to do their bidding. This orchid, known as Darwin's orchid, because it's one that he studied and made a wonderful prediction when he saw it -- you can see that there's a very long nectar tube that descends down from the orchid. And basically what the insect has to do -- we're in the middle of the flower -- it has to stick its little proboscis right into the middle of that and all the way down that nectar tube to get to the nectar. And Darwin said, looking at this flower, "I guess something has coevolved with this." And sure enough, there's the insect. And I mean, normally it kind of rolls it away, but in its erect form, that's what it looks like.

Now you can imagine that if nectar is such a valuable thing and expensive for the plant to produce and it attracts lots of pollinators, then, just as in human sex, people might start to deceive. They might say, "I've got a bit of nectar. Do you want to come and get it?" Now this is a plant. This is a plant here that insects in South Africa just love, and they've evolved with a long proboscis to get the nectar at the bottom. And this is the mimic. So this is a plant that is mimicking the first plant. And here is the long-probosced fly that has not gotten any nectar from the mimic, because the mimic doesn't give it any nectar. It thought it would get some. So not only has the fly not got the nectar from the mimic plant, it's also -- if you look very closely just at the head end, you can see that it's got a bit of pollen that it would be transmitting to another plant, if only some botanist hadn't come along and stuck it to a blue piece of card.

(Laughter)

Now deceit carries on through the plant kingdom. This flower with its black dots: they might look like black dots to us, but if I tell you, to a male insect of the right species, that looks like two females who are really, really hot to trot. (Laughter) And when the insect gets there and lands on it, dousing itself in pollen, of course, that it's going to take to another plant, if you look at the every-home-should-have-one scanning electron microscope picture, you can see that there are actually some patterning there, which is three-dimensional. So it probably even feels good for the insect, as well as looking good.

And these electron microscope pictures -- here's one of an orchid mimicking an insect -- you can see that different parts of the structure have different colors and different textures to our eye, have very, very different textures to what an insect might perceive. And this one is evolved to mimic a glossy metallic surface you see on some beetles. And under the scanning electron microscope, you can see the surface there -- really quite different from the other surfaces we looked at. Sometimes the whole plant mimics an insect, even to us. I mean, I think that looks like some sort of flying animal or beast. It's a wonderful, amazing thing.

This one's clever. It's called obsidian. I think of it as insidium sometimes. To the right species of bee, this looks like another very aggressive bee, and it goes and bonks it on the head lots and lots of times to try and drive it away, and, of course, covers itself with pollen. The other thing it does is that this plant mimics another orchid that has a wonderful store of food for insects. And this one doesn't have anything for them. So it's deceiving on two levels -- fabulous.

(Laughter)

Here we see ylang ylang, the component of many perfumes. I actually smelt someone with some on earlier. And the flowers don't really have to be that gaudy. They're sending out a fantastic array of scent to any insect that'll have it. This one doesn't smell so good. This is a flower that really, really smells pretty nasty and is designed, again, evolved, to look like carrion. So flies love this. They fly in and they pollinate. This, which is helicodiceros, is also known as dead horse arum. I don't know what a dead horse actually smells like, but this one probably smells pretty much like it. It's really horrible. And blowflies just can't help themselves. They fly into this thing, and they fly all the way down it. They lay their eggs in it, thinking it's a nice bit of carrion, and not realizing that there's no food for the eggs, that the eggs are going to die, but the plant, meanwhile, has benefited, because the bristles release and the flies disappear to pollinate the next flower -- fantastic.

Here's arum, arum maculatum, "lords and ladies," or "cuckoo-pint" in this country. I photographed this thing last week in Dorset. This thing heats up by about 15 degrees above ambient temperature -- amazing. And if you look down into it, there's this sort of dam past the spadix, flies get attracted by the heat -- which is boiling off volatile chemicals, little midges -- and they get trapped underneath in this container. They drink this fabulous nectar and then they're all a bit sticky. At night they get covered in pollen, which showers down over them, and then the bristles that we saw above, they sort of wilt and allow all these midges out, covered in pollen -- fabulous thing.

Now if you think that's fabulous, this is one of my great favorites. This is the philodendron selloum. For anyone here from Brazil, you'll know about this plant. This is the most amazing thing. That sort of phallic bit there is about a foot long. And it does something that no other plant that I know of does, and that is that when it flowers -- that's the spadix in the middle there -- for a period of about two days, it metabolizes in a way which is rather similar to mammals. So instead of having starch, which is the food of plants, it takes something rather similar to brown fat and burns it at such a rate that it's burning fat, metabolizing, about the rate of a small cat. And that's twice the energy output, weight for weight, than a hummingbird -- absolutely astonishing. This thing does something else which is unusual. Not only will it raise itself to 115 Fahrenheit, 43 or 44 degrees Centigrade, for two days, but it keeps constant temperature. There's a thermoregulation mechanism in there that keeps constant temperature. "Now why does it do this," I hear you ask. Now wouldn't you know it, there's some beetles that just love to make love at that temperature. And they get inside, and they get it all on. (Laughter) And the plant showers them with pollen, and off they go and pollinate. And what a wonderful thing it is.

Now most pollinators that we think about are insects, but actually in the tropics, many birds and butterflies pollinate. And many of the tropical flowers are red, and that's because butterflies and birds see similarly to us, we think, and can see the color red very well. But if you look at the spectrum, birds and us, we see red, green and blue and see that spectrum. Insects see green, blue and ultraviolet, and they see various shades of ultraviolet. So there's something that goes on off the end there. "And wouldn't it be great if we could somehow see what that is," I hear you ask. Well yes we can. So what is an insect seeing? Last week I took these pictures of rock rose, helianthemum, in Dorset. These are little yellow flowers like we all see, little yellow flowers all over the place. And this is what it looks like with visible light. This is what it looks like if you take out the red. Most bees don't perceive red. And then I put some ultraviolet filters on my camera and took a very, very long exposure with the particular frequencies of ultraviolet light and this is what I got. And that's a real fantastic bull's eye.

Now we don't know exactly what a bee sees, any more than you know what I'm seeing when I call this red. We can't know what's going on in -- let alone an insect's -- another human being's mind. But the contrast will look something like that, so standing out a lot from the background. Here's another little flower -- different range of ultraviolet frequencies, different filters to match the pollinators. And that's the sort of thing that it would be seeing. Just in case you think that all yellow flowers have this property -- no flower was damaged in the process of this shot; it was just attached to the tripod, not killed -- then under ultraviolet light, look at that. And that could be the basis of a sunscreen because sunscreens work by absorbing ultraviolet light. So maybe the chemical in that would be useful.

Finally, there's one of evening primrose that Bjorn Rorslett from Norway sent me -- fantastic hidden pattern. And I love the idea of something hidden. I think there's something poetic here, that these pictures taken with ultraviolet filter, the main use of that filter is for astronomers to take pictures of Venus -- actually the clouds of Venus. That's the main use of that filter. Venus, of course, is the god of love and fertility, which is the flower story. And just as flowers spend a lot of effort trying to get pollinators to do their bidding, they've also somehow managed to persuade us to plant great fields full of them and give them to each other at times of birth and death, and particularly at marriage, which, when you think of it, is the moment that encapsulates the transfer of genetic material from one organism to another.

Thank you very much.

(Applause)

TED Conversations

Got an idea, question, or debate inspired by this talk? Start a TED Conversation.

Comment on this Talk

153 total comments

This comment will be attributed to . Not ? Sign Out.

Characters remaining: 2000

  • thumb
    6 days ago: A window in to the amazing mechanisms of paradise :-)
  • thumb
    May 11 2012: This is what I consider a very well done TED lecture. It breaks down the idea to its very basic components. Then it translates the jargon into everyday language that most people can understand. To me this is a great architype of TED lecturing. Nicely done.
  • May 4 2012: great talk, beautiful conclusion! I live in the Philippines where the ylang-ylang( we spell it ilang-ilang) is quite well-known. It's hung on rear view mirrors, much like what we do with the national flower, the sampaguita (which also smells great). I love Philippine flowers: the gumamela and kalachuchi are some of my favorites, hope they get studied as much as the flowers mentioned here. Thanks, Jonathan!
  • thumb
    Mar 1 2012: It is really a very fascinating theory. But just recently many believe in it because it is trendier rather than proved. About 2000 Years long people believed that the Earth was the center of the universe. They were wrong. The evolution theory is around for ca. 159 Years. I would be very cautious considering that as law and fact.
    • Sep 5 2012: I agree; evolution is a theory and not a law.

      Science tries to explain the world around us based on testable evidence. I don't think any credible scientist will assert that a theory is an absolute fact. All scientists can do is observe; then choose the theory that fits best, given what they've observed.

      Since paleontology mostly seems to confirm evolutionary theory, most scientists tend towards the theory of evolution.

      Your point is valid. Evolution is neither a law nor an irrefutable fact. It is simply widely accepted by the scientific community based on observation.
  • Oct 24 2011: how do the plants know how to mimic when they don't have any eyes?
    • thumb
      Nov 2 2011: Good question Namit. I think one answer might be that through random mutations some plants here and there might be just a little bit more successful than others in attracting a pollinator. Maybe they have a slightly different pattern, maybe they smell a little bit tastier - who knows? The point is that those plants are more likely to attract pollinators, and therefore just a bit more likely to spread their genes. This means that there'll be more plants with those characteristics. Over many generations of plants, they may have adapted in such a way that they appeal to pollinators, not through any intentionality but just through natural selection. This process might be made a little faster by the fact that the pollinators too are evolving at the same time. The ones that happen to have the best chance of getting to the nectar, or finding the flower in the first place - well, they'll have a better chance of having more progeny, so those characteristics spread.
      Mimicry complete. No eyes required. I don't know how well I've explained this - I'm a little bleary after a long day. There are lots of good books on the subject though.
      Thanks for asking the question.
  • Oct 15 2011: Aunque en la mayor parte del video describe lo que el expositor llama los trucos de las flores , estos conociminetos son muy utiles para ciencias como la biomimesis. Ejemplo el uso de las propiedades ultravioleta de algunas flores o la emulacio de estos mismos.
  • thumb
    Oct 13 2011: The happier person in this discussion is Jonathan. He speaks about flowers and insects with real joy and everything seems a fabulous world where all is possible.... what an amazing speech....
  • thumb
    Oct 1 2011: Interesting with just the right dash of humor. I enjoyed both the content and the easy way about the speaker. In addition, I like his response to John McKay below. Nice work.
  • thumb
    Aug 30 2011: One flower I got to see and smell (yuck!) was the Amorphophallus Titanium wich emits a smell of rotting meat so flies go in. Wich shows pollenators arent always attracted by beautiful or scented flowers just like us.
  • thumb
    Aug 19 2011: That is a brilliant summary of the inherent design the unified field delivers insuring continued life and diversity, if only humans would STOP taking nature for granted and get out of the way.
  • Jul 26 2011: It really is a shame. No matter where you go these days, if something even mentions evolution, you can almost be guaranteed that some ignorant person will come with the same old strawmen, same old misconceptions, the same old denial and the same old anti-science agenda. We've all seen it dozens of times before. Couldn't these creationists just ... go away or something? The grown-ups are talking.
  • Jul 25 2011: What a fascinating, charming talk. It's refreshing to find some TED talks can still be packed with great content and insight, while so many others these days sadly seem to be full of hype and are light on anything truely enlightening.

    Thank you Jonathan, IMO other TED soeakers should take note.

    P.S. In response to some other comments on this thread, I too am tired of the evolution "debate"- it's been done all over the internet, and all over the world so many times, and unfortunately isn't going to get anywhere in a forum like this.
  • Jul 22 2011: Interesting take on the sexualization of flowers. Just more proof that Nature is infinitely powerful.
    An interesting and informative presentation. Sex sells!
  • Jul 21 2011: This is exactly why I LOVE TED. You are guaranteed passionate, eloquent and enthusiastic speakers on topics as obscure and intricate as this. Who knew? Thank you, Jonathan for challenging me to become more aware of what a flower might actually signify.

    Based on all of the comments, you have created quite a conversation. It's fascinating to read the many interpretations, but for me, it was pretty simple... I've learned something new about something I knew nothing about. I loved your talk, it spoke to science, nature, art and beauty. I think I do actually care to have a closer look! Now THAT'S fabulous! I'm a very busy mom and oftentimes forget to stop and smell/consider the flowers and their significance.

    Your photography is also amazingly beautiful and inspiring.

    Awesome. Thanks for this talk!
    All the best, Sarah
  • thumb
    Jul 18 2011: so nice .... poetic ....
  • Jul 17 2011: Inspiring performance on Ted.com. The thumbnail view of flowering plants triggered my interest. On our website tuinsms.nl (we send free garden alerts by sms and e-mail) we show something similar, see http://www.tuinsms.nl/zoekenopkleur/
  • Jul 17 2011: brilliant presentation. thoughts about the implications of global climate change upon highly specialized adaptation? radical expressions of symbiosis imply greater relative maladaptation to sudden change eg. mass concurrent extinctions.
  • thumb
    Jul 16 2011: I'm often surprised at how uncomfortable certain speakers such as Jonathan become when talking about sex and reproduction.
  • Jul 15 2011: Thanks Jonathon; I am new to TED.
    I am excited find this community,
    but disappointed to see
    how conversations are 'hi-jacked'
    by faith-based pot-stirrers.
    "'Tis too starved an argument
    for my sword!"
    Shakespeare?
    Cheers
    Ray Bannatyne
  • thumb
    Jul 15 2011: Well done Jonathan!
  • thumb
    Jul 15 2011: Some of the things he talked about are illustrated here: http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10150314066969783.391055.708504782&l=6ebf70c937 (last 2 pics of 5)

    Flowers are mandalas 'designed' by evolution in feedback with the insect eye.
  • Jul 15 2011: I enjoyed that. I think the correlation (between species) of appreciation of beauty in flowers has some depth.

    I suspect this is hog wash, but the idea plants, specifically flowers, have no neurons makes me understand their evolution is purely a result of environmental conditions. With that in mind, it is fun to consider why so many look beautiful. Natural Selection with a biased for beauty as we perceive.

    I appreciate the keen eye for beauty that insects and birds apparently have :)
  • Jul 15 2011: Kudos to you, Jonathan Drori. Your talk was artful, humorous and highly informative. I fail to see how anyone could have taken you intentionality remarks seriously. Thank you for a brilliant presentation!
  • Jul 14 2011: If you enjoyed this, then check out
    "In the Company of Wild Butterflies"
    They go hand in hand. (I found it on Netflix)
  • Jul 12 2011: Loved how it really introduced some amazing stuff and gave a deeper character to otherwise ordinary flowers. My appreciation for flowers, the animals that work for them, and nature in general just got a big boost.

This comment will be attributed to . Not ? Sign Out.

Characters remaining: 2000

In this visually dazzling talk, Jonathan Drori shows the extraordinary ways flowering plants -- over a quarter million species -- have evolved to attract insects to spread their pollen: growing 'landing-strips' to guide the insects in, shining in ultraviolet, building elaborate traps, and even mimicking other insects in heat.

Jonathan Drori commissioned the BBC's very first websites, one highlight in a long career devoted to online culture and educational media -- and understanding how we learn. Full bio »

What to Watch Next

Play_iconJonathan Drori: Every pollen grain has a story

Jonathan Drori: Every pollen grain has a story

Play_iconLouie Schwartzberg: The hidden beauty of pollination

Louie Schwartzberg: The hidden beauty of pollination

Play_iconNalini Nadkarni on conserving the canopy

Nalini Nadkarni on conserving the canopy

Related Themes And Tags

Creative Commons

We want you to share our Talks!

Just follow the guidelines outlined under our Creative Commons license.