Yahoo!. Now with Friends.

Discover news, videos and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Wikipedia Blackout: Websites Wikipedia, Reddit, Others Go Dark Wednesday to Protest SOPA, PIPA

    Do not try to look up "Internet Censorship" or "SOPA" or "PIPA" on Wikipedia, the giant online encyclopedia, on Wednesday.

    SOPA and PIPA are two bills in Congress meant to stop the illegal copying and sharing of movies and music on the Internet, but major Internet companies say the bills would put them in the impossible position of policing the online world.

    Wikipedia's founder, Jimmy Wales, now says his site will go dark for the day on Wednesday, joining a budding movement to protest the two bills.

    "This is going to be wow," Wales said on Twitter. "I hope Wikipedia will melt phone systems in Washington on Wednesday. Tell everyone you know!"

    Other sites, such as Reddit and Boing Boing, have already said they would go dark on Wednesday. And some of the biggest names online, including Google, Facebook, Twitter and Tumblr, have vocally opposed the proposed legislation.

    PIPA, the Protect IP Act in the Senate, and SOPA, the Stop Online Piracy Act, have been presented as a way to protect movie studios, record labels and others. Supporters range from the Country Music Association to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

    But the Internet giants say the bills could require your Internet provider to block websites that are involved in digital file sharing. And search engines such as Google, Yahoo and Bing could be stopped from linking to them -- antithetical, they say, to the ideal of an open Internet.

    "If you want an Internet where human rights, free speech and the rule of law are not subordinated to the entertainment industry's profits, I hope you'll join us," said Cory Doctorow of Boing Boing.

    Wikipedia, the sixth most visited site in the world, said its English version will be dark for 24 hours Wednesday, urging users to contact Congress. Other joiners of the movement include Mozilla, which offers the Firefox Web browser; the Wordpress blogging site; and TwitPic, which allows Twitter users to post images online.

    The House bill is on hold for now, and there are rumblings that both bills may be toned down because of the vocal opposition. The White House over the weekend said it had reservations about the approach the two bills take.

    "While we believe that online piracy by foreign websites is a serious problem that requires a serious legislative response, we will not support legislation that reduces freedom of expression, increases cybersecurity risk, or undermines the dynamic, innovative global Internet," wrote three White House managers, including Aneesh Chopra, the U.S. Chief Technology Officer.

    "Any effort to combat online piracy must guard against the risk of online censorship of lawful activity and must not inhibit innovation by our dynamic businesses large and small."

    It has become a battle pitting Hollywood against Silicon Valley -- movie studios and music publishers want to stop the theft of their creative work, but Internet companies do not want to be cast as the police force.

    "There isn't one technology company or venture capitalist who supports these bills," said Markham Erickson, the executive director of NetCoalition, a trade group for Internet firms, in an interview with ABC News.

    "An 'Internet blackout' would obviously be both drastic and unprecedented," NetCoalition said in a statement. "We hope that the Senate will cancel its scheduled vote on PIPA so that we can get back to working with members on how to address the concerns raised by the MPAA [Motion Picture Association of America] and others without threatening our nation's security or future innovation and jobs."

    The heads of major Internet companies say they grant that music publishers and Hollywood studios have a real problem: People are stealing their music and movies, making digital copies that are as crisp and clear as the originals, and offering them for download, often from overseas websites.

    The music and film industries say they consider that a major threat, even a decade after Napster made online file sharing a major issue.

    "More than 2.2 million hard-working, middle-class people in all 50 states depend on the entertainment industry for their jobs and many millions more work in other industries that rely on intellectual property," Michael O'Leary of the Motion Picture Association of America said in a statement. "For all these workers and their families, online content and counterfeiting by these foreign sites mean declining incomes, lost jobs and reduced health and retirement benefits."

    But the devil is in the details, said NetCoalition's Erickson.

    "This bill reverses the policy that has been in place since the beginning of the Web," he said, "that Internet companies shouldn't be liable, nor should they be required to police or snoop on their users."

    Also Read

    474 comments

    • a voice in the wilderness  â€¢  Fort Worth, Texas  â€¢  6 hrs ago
      wouldent those bills violate the free speech amendment?
    • somethingsneverchange  â€¢  6 hrs ago
      Congress hard at work defending corporate interests while more than happy to throw everyone else's interests under the bus.
    •  â€¢  5 hrs ago
      KEEP POLITICS OUT OF OUR FREEDOMS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Count  â€¢  Union City, Pennsylvania  â€¢  5 hrs ago
      Isn't piracy already illegal? Isn't it up to the copyright holder to enforce their claim? Why is Congress involved?
    • Masahiro  â€¢  5 hrs ago
      google and yahoo need to join in this wednesday blackout- the government is out of control
    • DJ  â€¢  6 hrs ago
      If this passes, then everyone should stop buying music, going to movies, watching Tv, etc....Youtube will go out of business, ticks me off that people like Garth Brooks, etc...block anything & everything they have done for the all mighty $, the average person can't even afford to go to a concert anymore. Or take their family to a movie, if you can find one the actual family could go to.
    • Kevin H  â€¢  6 hrs ago
      Half of Congress doesn't even know how to use the Internet
    • Rick C  â€¢  6 hrs ago
      Congress has only its lobbyist in mind. The citizens are yet again screwed. Any congressman who is pro SOPA will not get my (or anyone within my circle at least 30 ppl) vote come any upcoming and future elections. I present u a stiff middle finger.!.
    • Nukie  â€¢  6 hrs ago
      So, why isn't the ACLU all over this fight? They could do something right for once, and try to support the freedoms of the American people, and oppose this legislation.
    • Net Guy  â€¢  Baltimore, Maryland  â€¢  5 hrs ago
      I am all for the elimination of software piracy, and support intellectual rights, but inconveniencing Internet consumers and users is not the way to go about it. To me, that's what the legislation would do. The model of increased encryption and security of software and media, followed by the "hackers' breaking/bypassing that encryption and security should continue. Government involvement, in my opinion, can only be bad.
    • JOSE THE SAINT  â€¢  6 hrs ago
      I am sure the Film, & Music industries are hurting.... Oh Lil Wayne just bought a New Bentley. Some movie star is selling their $60 Million dollar Mansion. Yeah really hurting.... Kick everyone out of congress and hold a new election for every seat...
    • Squirrelneck  â€¢  New York, New York  â€¢  6 hrs ago
      Paramount CEO Brad Gray complained that if Congress didn't do something to curb piracy and protect his assets his daughter might have to drive an Acura to college next year!

      "A [EXPLETIVE] Acura!", he said; "Jesus Christ, she might as well be taking the [SAME EXPLETIVE] bus!"
    • teabaggerssuckblowandchea ...  â€¢  5 hrs ago
      Obama, take a stand. VETO THIS BILL.
    • jeffw  â€¢  Sunnyvale, California  â€¢  5 hrs ago
      Aint that what they do in China? oops RED CHINA?????
    • Eli  â€¢  Gloversville, New York  â€¢  5 hrs ago
      Whatever happened to the laissez-faire attitude this country used to have? Why doesn't the government just come over and live my life for me?
    • Squirrelneck  â€¢  New York, New York  â€¢  6 hrs ago
      Ever see a movie studio executive or a record company vice president in line for food stamps? Just sayin'.
    • Jules  â€¢  6 hrs ago
      Internet censorship was always for countries that wanted to control their citizens and not let them see news of the outside world. If it's one thing today, what will it be tomorrow?

      You say that millions depend on these industries, what about the Internet companies? I'm sure there are thousands (tens or hundreds of) of people employed by the Internet companies who would now have to police all of their customers. This would cost a bunch of money. And unlike Hollywood, the Internet is now basically a requirement for students to do their schoolwork; at the very least, the Internet can and has helped the classroom overall. What happens when Internet costs shoot up and some families can no longer afford Internet access?
    • dokk_2000  â€¢  Dallas, Texas  â€¢  6 hrs ago
      To the members of the Senate and the House:

      Pay attention! The people are speaking!
    • Tymorial  â€¢  4 hrs ago
      You want to know why this bill is being passed? This is a PRIME example of Washington corruption. From the sunlight foundation which is a nonprofit washington organization with the goal to make issues like this transparent. Be ready to be shocked (or no if you realize that our government is broken). Career totals in donations from hollywood and media lobbyist groups that have pushed for this bill to the 40 senators supporting this bill: the drum rolle please

      Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., $1,996,470
      • Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., $1,465,160
      • Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., $1,295,718
      • Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., $899,366 (sponsor)
      • Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., $890,668
      • Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., $747,491
      • Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mont., $503,291
      • Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., $493,069
      • Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, $492,407
      • Sen. Robert Menéndez, D-N.J., $445,575
      • Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., $430,500
      • Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., $368,733
      • Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., $365,589
      • Sen. Robert Casey, D-Penn., $343,225
      • Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., $312,320
      • Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., $297,771
      • Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, $291,621
      • Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, $284,225
      • Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., $254,162
      • Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., $237,084
      • Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., $230,569
      • Sen. Benjamin Cardin, D-Md., $218,539
      • Sen. Tom Udall, D-N.M., - $217,847
      • Sen. Kay Hagan, D-N.C., - $171,790
      • Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., $158,066
      • Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., $94,45
    • Gunny  â€¢  6 hrs ago
      ALL BECAUSE OF HOLLYWOOD. Screw them. The internet is bigger than all of them.
    [ [ [['Dekraai', 10]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/mourners-remember-seal-beach-shooting-victims-1318620627-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/3/2c/32c8e92d889f42edb719cb5257afdf4e.jpeg', '461', ' ', 'Reuters/Lori Shepler', ], [ [['iPhone 4SXXXXXXX', 11]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/thousands-line-up-for-apple-s-iphone-4s-1318602841-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/f/4f/f4f15e8f6f323f5386dc9fdf9e15dca8.jpeg', '500', ' ', 'AP/Kirsty Wigglesworth', ] ]
    [ [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], '27013743', '0' ], [ [['keyword', 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]