Newton–Cotes formulas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Newton-Cotes formulas)
Jump to: navigation, search
Newton-Cotes formula for n=2

In numerical analysis, the Newton–Cotes formulae, also called the Newton–Cotes quadrature rules or simply Newton–Cotes rules, are a group of formulae for numerical integration (also called quadrature) based on evaluating the integrand at equally-spaced points. They are named after Isaac Newton and Roger Cotes.

Newton–Cotes formulae can be useful if the value of the integrand at equally-spaced points is given. If it is possible to change the points at which the integrand is evaluated, then other methods such as Gaussian quadrature and Clenshaw–Curtis quadrature are probably more suitable.

Contents

 [hide

[edit] Description

It is assumed that the value of a function ƒ defined on [ab] is known at equally spaced points xi, for i = 0, …, n, where x0 = a and xn = b. There are two types of Newton–Cotes formulae, the "closed" type which uses the function value at all points, and the "open" type which does not use the function values at the endpoints. The closed Newton-Cotes formula of degree n is stated as

int_a^b f(x) ,dx approx sum_{i=0}^n w_i, f(x_i)

where xi = h i + x0, with h (called the step size) equal to (xnx0) / n = (ba) / n. The wi are called weights.

As can be seen in the following derivation the weights are derived from the Lagrange basis polynomials. This means they depend only on the xi and not on the function ƒ. Let L(x) be the interpolation polynomial in the Lagrange form for the given data points (x0, ƒ(x0) ), …, (xn, ƒ(xn) ), then

 int_a^b f(x) ,dx approx int_a^b L(x),dx = int_a^b bigl( sum_{i=0}^n f(x_i), l_i(x) bigr) , dx 
= sum_{i=0}^n f(x_i) underbrace{int_a^b l_i(x), dx}_{w_i}.

The open Newton–Cotes formula of degree n is stated as

int_a^b f(x), dx approx sum_{i=1}^{n-1} w_i, f(x_i).

The weights are found in a manner similar to the closed formula.

[edit] Instability for high degree

A Newton–Cotes formula of any degree n can be constructed. However, for large n a Newton–Cotes rule can sometimes suffer from catastrophic Runge's phenomenon where the error grows exponentially for large n. Methods such as Gaussian quadrature and Clenshaw–Curtis quadrature with unequally spaced points (clustered at the endpoints of the integration interval) are stable and much more accurate, and are normally preferred to Newton–Cotes. If these methods can not be used, because the integrand is only given at the fixed equidistributed grid, then Runge's phenomenon can be avoided by using a composite rule, as explained below.

[edit] Closed Newton–Cotes formulae

This table lists some of the Newton–Cotes formulae of the closed type. The notation f_i is a shorthand for f(x_i), with xi = a + i (ba) / n, and n the degree.

Closed Newton–Cotes Formulae
Degree Common name Formula Error term
1 Trapezoid rule  frac{b-a}{2} (f_0 + f_1) -frac{(b-a)^3}{12},f^{(2)}(xi)
2 Simpson's rule  frac{b-a}{6} (f_0 + 4 f_1 + f_2) -frac{(b-a)^5}{2880},f^{(4)}(xi)
3 Simpson's 3/8 rule  frac{b-a}{8} (f_0 + 3 f_1 + 3 f_2 + f_3) -frac{(b-a)^5}{6480},f^{(4)}(xi)
4 Boole's rule  frac{b-a}{90} (7 f_0 + 32 f_1 + 12 f_2 + 32 f_3 + 7 f_4) -frac{(b-a)^7}{1935360},f^{(6)}(xi)

Boole's rule is sometimes mistakenly called Bode's rule due to propagation of a typo in Abramowitz and Stegun, an early reference book.[1]

The exponent of the segment size b − a in the error term shows the rate at which the approximation error decreases. The derivative of ƒ in the error term shows which polynomials can be integrated exactly (i.e., with error equal to zero). Note that the derivative of ƒ in the error term increases by 2 for every other rule. The number xi is between a and b.

[edit] Open Newton–Cotes formulae

This table lists some of the Newton–Cotes formulae of the open type. Again, ƒi is a shorthand for ƒ(xi), with xi = a + i (ba) / n, and n the degree.

Open Newton–Cotes Formulae
Common name step size Formula Error term Degree
Rectangle rule, or
midpoint rule
frac{b-a}{2} (b-a) f_1, frac{(b-a)^3}{24},f^{(2)}(xi) 2
Trapezoid method frac{b-a}{3}  frac{b-a}{2} (f_1 + f_2)  frac{(b-a)^3}{36},f^{(2)}(xi) 3
Milne's rule frac{b-a}{4}  frac{b-a}{3} (2 f_1 - f_2 + 2 f_3)  frac{7(b-a)^5}{23040}f^{(4)}(xi) 4
No name frac{b-a}{5}  frac{b-a}{24} (11 f_1 + f_2 + f_3 + 11 f_4)  frac{19(b-a)^5}{90000}f^{(4)}(xi) 5

[edit] Composite rules

For the Newton–Cotes rules to be accurate, the step size h needs to be small, which means that the interval of integration [a, b] must be small itself, which is not true most of the time. For this reason, one usually performs numerical integration by splitting [a, b] into smaller subintervals, applying a Newton–Cotes rule on each subinterval, and adding up the results. This is called a composite rule, see Numerical integration.

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ Booles Rule at Wolfram Mathworld

[edit] External links

View page ratings
Rate this page
Trustworthy
Objective
Complete
Well-written
We will send you a confirmation e-mail. We will not share your e-mail address with outside parties as per our feedback privacy statement.
Saved successfully
Your ratings have not been submitted yet
Your ratings have expired
Please reevaluate this page and submit new ratings.
An error has occurred. Please try again later.
Thanks! Your ratings have been saved.
Do you want to create an account?
An account will help you track your edits, get involved in discussions, and be a part of the community.
or
Thanks! Your ratings have been saved.
Did you know that you can edit this page?