RAW STORY IS:
CARBON BALANCED; ALL CARBON EMISSIONS ARE OFFSET!

Woolsey to introduce ‘robust public option’ bill

By Sahil Kapur
Thursday, July 22nd, 2010 -- 8:35 am

woolseyflag Woolsey to introduce robust public option billWASHINGTON – What, did you think the fight for health care reform was over?

Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-CA), co-chair of the progressive caucus, is making good on her promise to continue pushing for a public health insurance option after the enactment of sweeping reform legislation.

On Thursday afternoon, the Northern California congresswoman will announce the introduction of a bill offering consumers a choice between private plans and a "robust" public plan in the health insurance exchanges set up by the law.

"The robust public option offers lower-cost competition to private insurance companies," Woolsey told Raw Story. "This will make insurance more affordable for those who do not have it and keep insurance affordable for those who do. We are introducing the public option now so is will be available as a ready-made off set or deficit reducer in this or the next Congress."

In an email, she promised it would "rein in the spiraling costs of premiums" and "save billions of dollars and improve health care while doing it."

Story continues below...

The bill currently has 121 co-sponsors in the House, Woolsey said, and has won strong praise from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT).

"I am very pleased that Congresswoman Woolsey and 120 of her colleagues in the House are introducing a bill to create a strong public option operating in every state exchange," Sanders told Raw Story. "I have long been in favor of a Medicare-for-all, single-payer health care system, but in the post-Affordable Care Act world I think the very least we can do is to offer every person the option of choosing a government-run health insurance plan over a private one."

While the insurance industry fears competition from the government, polls have suggested that a large majority of Americans support a public option, and the Congressional Budget Office estimates that such a provision would help reduce the deficit.

"It comes as no surprise to me that the CBO continues to recognize that such a public option will save significant amounts of money for the federal taxpayer," Sanders said.

Progressives are enthusiastic about the provision, for which there is strong support in the House. But it could be a nonstarter in the Senate this year, due to the busy calendar and fast approaching November midterm elections.

Woolsey was a vocal supporter of a public plan during the grueling yearlong debate. Though she voted for the bill even after it was removed, she told Raw Story in February she wouldn’t stop fighting for the provision.

In an op-ed for The Hill last week, Woolsey called the Affordable Care Act  a "historic first step," but argued that the law enacted in March must be followed by "an even longer stride into history by establishing a robust public option."

  • Sorry but this will be a terrible idea. The other day i went to the Dr to have my blood pressure cheked, the Dr asked me when if i was going back to Malaysia anytime soon? i told him , not anytime soon.. He said about not getting sick over there. As the health care here in the US is much better here. You don,t want to get sick over there unless you go to a private hosiptal and don,t go to the gov hospital there. Just remember when the US has gov owning all the health care going on here and you want care. ha you go then"opps'
  • So, your doctor is an expert in Malaysian medicine? Is that a required course in American med schools? I'm an American living in Taiwan and couldn't be happier with the National Health Service here. Also, I guess your doctor is an expert in international economics. Seeing as Malaysia is a relatively poor country, its gov't run system is probably substandard to what an industrialized nation could do. Did you even bother to ask your doctor for his credentials when offering this opinion? I'm guessing not...
  • osXmacs
    I've mentioned national health care to the medical professionals I come into contact with. Most express the Fundamentalist Republican hatred of Government sponsored health care while at the same time complaining how Private Insurance Corporations are controlling their practices. One Doctor told me a patient who needed 7 days in the hospital was only granted 2 days. Private Health Care Insurance is over riding your Doctors prescriptions & care procedures.!!
  • MissRealDemocracyFearSCOTUS
    I know this may take time, but it is wise and good to continue to press the discourse, rather than letting the right control issues and the framing of those issues in the media. Proud to say Lynn Woolsey is my representative.
  • Dolmance
    The Public Option is going to have to be passed, because ultimately there won't be enough money to satisfy the health insurance industry.

    In 1965 health care took six percent of American's yearly salary. Today it's 17 percent, and the insurance companies are raising prices all over the place.

    Wages have remained static for nearly half a century. Every gain the American worker has made in the last 45 years has been eaten up by the health care industry. It's not sustainable.
  • jimprues
    While it's very easy to poke at our government for all their bad policy and elitist tendencies, there are a few honest brokers in Washington working for we, the people. Along with Ms. Woolsey, Kucinich and Grayson are rocks among the host of corporate-sucking jellyfish.

    So yes, go after our government for the corporate welfare and bloated 'defense' budget, but let's not be so jaded that we don't trust anything the government does. That leaves us as anarchists or republicans.
  • Hi Jim,
    I have to ask, what it is that the government has done for the benefit of us in the last 20 to 30 years? Name something, please, because I don't see it, I don't see one thing that we can clearly lay on the shoulders of our governments policies that have benefited the American people as a whole or groups of us as individuals?

    Everything they touch turns to sh!t. If you can't see it, change your diet, lay off the aspartame and turn off the TV.

    We've had a corrupt government all of my life and then some...

    Just look at the word itself.

    Government comes from the Latin govern (control) and mente (mind).

    Government = mind control.

    And please don't consider yourself democrat, republican or atheist, you're so much more than these short sighted terms.
  • The government passes literally hundreds to thousands of bills a year. Reading through such a dense list would be excessively boring, but if you could do so and still honestly feel as if there have been no changes which affect you in a positive way then I'm not sure I understand what level of accommodation you expect.

    People seem to think that the Obama administration isn't doing anything. Whether or not one agrees with his political stance, he has made good on a great deal of his 500 campaign promises and has apparently been the most diligent president in 60 years when it comes to passing bills (i.e. he's made more changes in his current span of office than any other single president has in six decades). I'm not sure if it's saying much, but didn't he exceed the productivity of the Bush administration's entire two terms by the end of his first year?

    Point is, things are actually getting done. I've taken a look at some of the changes and while I don't agree with all of them I'm actually surprised at how many good bills seem to get passed without any sort of fanfare.

    On another note I'm rather familiar with Latin and your etymology is a bit flawed. The word definitely did not come directly into English from Latin, and the '-ment' is preserved from the French where it was indicative of the noun form of a verb. Govern... government. It works the same way in many languages and you would be hard pressed to make an etymological connection to "mind" for other words that follow this scheme... garment, commencement, ornament, fragment, etc. The connection to -ment as "mind" is a false etymology, but it's understandable why someone would make that assumption.

    The actual word for "government" in Latin is "rectio" or, more relevantly here, "gubernatio". "Gubernatio" comes from the Greek "kubernan" which means to navigate or to pilot, or to steer. You get the idea. The meaning is preserved into Latin more or less.

    This reminds me of that "poly-ticks-->politics" etymology joke.
  • Dolmance
    Go see a psychiatrist, tell them what you just wrote and get yourself some depression medication.
  • Typical TROLL... They attack the poster, not the post.

    Since you couldn't refute the message you tell me to seek meds?

    Aww... Didn't anyone ever teach you how to debate a point?

    Perhaps you should cut back on the aspartame too, ha.
  • azhermit
    "There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again."

    -Bloviator, Dear Leader and Cocaine Kingpin
  • Our health comes from within and no-one seems to care that that's where this health care problem begins.

    Here's an idea...

    Perhaps they can write a bill that creates a robust public so we don't need as much health care.

    In it they can:

    Outlaw Monsanto's Frankenseed
    Ban the use of cancer causing food additives such as aspartame, high fructose corn syrup, msg and all food dyes.
    Tear up HR 875 The Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009
    Prohibit the use of Fluoride
    ...

    What else would you like included? It's your bill too!
  • tcarlson
    There are true Democrats like Dennis Kucinich and true Republicans like Ron Paul. But, the vast majority in Congress (and Obama) are Corporatists. In reality we have a three-party system but only one of them gets to decide anything (including who will be president) and you know which one that is.

    Shouldn't truth in advertising rules come into play so we don't have to continue with the charade of this phony two-party system? Just a thought.
  • cireeric
    And we all know that government run anything is better than private companies.
  • azhermit
    is that you bibi? i thought you quit the crack when you only had one tooth left.
  • ARealAmerican2
    What American private companies have had as long a successful existence as the U.S. government has? Exactly why do you think private businesses are run better? Private businesses go belly up by the thousands everyday.
  • raylang
    Presumably, that comment is sarcastic. But one question that I haven't heard an answer to is this: what's the difference between a govt. bureaucrat sitting between me and my health care provider and a private insurance company bureaucrat sitting between me and my health care provider?
  • Tyke
    Easy. The private insurance company bureaucrat gets paid substantially MORE if he/she is successful in denying you care.
  • Dr_Buzz
    Here's one for you Senate mavens out there. Seems to me that if this bill reduces the deficit, then the Senate does not need to go through the usual 60-vote super-majority to pass it -- just a simple majority. Am I remembering that right?
  • Tyke
    oops - replied to wrong post. Removed
  • geo1671
    Let us knock-off the bullsh!t about health care REFORM. No matter how you dress the pig it's going to be Kosher reform style ( JewUS). What is needed--break the high cost of medical SALARIES.Pass laws--wanna be a doc or a nurse--2 year college degree and thousands of medical schools opened up--BUT a cap on SALARIES of $100,000 and none of this training crap needed. Is a Doc worth $30 million/year just because he got a med license? Come to Canad and see them make big buck$ working 3 years per 2 day week..
    All medicines--none of this Pharma despensing fees of $20++ for tablets worth 15 cents and max for all drugs $30. No lobbists near Washington or the death penality :^/
  • lyris
    geo is a teabagging/gop who knows nothing about anything. He worships the corporations and lacks knowledge in economy.

    Apparently he's in favor of our jobs going to China and other countries leaving Americans jobless or working in low paying jobs like McDonalds.

    Remember when these people claimed they were patriots?

    Well to quote rep. wilson, "You lie!" You do not love our country because you don't care about our people.
  • tdoff
    First of all adjusted for inflation, physicians have actually seen the amount of share of their pay decrease over the last 40 years(avg physician in the us take home 135,000 not bad but not what you make it out to be). This may be because of increased overhead(insurance coders, malpractice, etc...) The only segment in that 40 years that has seen a huge increase and accounts for 30-40% of total increase in medical costs over that period has been insurance overhead and profit. Physician salary has followed inflation since the 1960's. I wish I still had the link, but put that up against insurance costs and that is where the money is going. Second would you go to a physician who had only 3 years of training who is making less than 50k a year after their administrative costs. I'm not saying that a doctor deserves 30 million (considering that figure is a piooma value), but I hope that the person cutting into my skull has had 10+ years of training and isn't worrying about if they can pay their staff or their mortgage this month why they put a drill to my skull. Oh also medical school now will leave you 250k in the hole as soon as you get out to practice. Some food for thought.
  • jacklohman
    The best public option is to allow people and companies to opt into Medicare. It is 95% private and if "private" is truly more efficient than public, people will opt to stay with their current system. But we all know that is hoghwash, and the option will go a long way toward fixing a very deficient ObamaCare.
  • 1nancy2
    J: Yes, I agree. There are too many deficiencies in the Obama care, 14 month debacle, which was written by the CEO's of the health care complex. That crappy bill needs to be totally overhauled. It does not reduce costs, so Americans are still bending over and paying...$..for reduced services that don't even come close to excellent....Poor to fair services is more like it.
  • lyris
    If you paid attention to what was actually going on you would know that there were some corporatist Democrats that helped caused the so called "Obama Care." along with the fascist gop.

    You do understand that the president can only suggest ideas for laws but can't make a bill don't you?

    Perhaps many Americans should go back to school and actually learn about their government, and pay attention this time.
  • 1nancy2
    Lyris, You certainly have a high opinion of yourself. I pay attention and know what is going on. In addition, I am well aware that the Dems are in bed with the corps...Blue Dogs? Perhaps you should go to school in order to improve your social interaction skills, then we can talk again at a later date. I would like that, Lyris.
  • Guest
    Yea, but nothing is going to change until we have public funding of campaigns. The McCain-Feingold bill was watered down by McConnell and DeLay or it would have done the job. What is it about political bribes do we not understand?

    If politicians are going to be beholden to their funders, those funders should be the taxpayers. And at $5 per taxpayer per year it would be a bargain. Even at 100 times that. We MUST lobby our senators and representative to co-sponsor the bill at:
    http://www.fairelectionsnow.org/more/summary

    Jack Lohman …
    http://MoneyedPoliticians.net
  • 1nancy2
    Guest: Thanks and we need all the help we can get. The corps reign supreme in this country, topped off by a nice. red cherry compliments, of the S. Court, with their stupid ruling, stiffing the American people. I will lobby as you suggest, but I don't think the Congress is listening or even caring. Those big dollars allow them to look the other way, rather than do what is right.
  • I'm not sure on any of this.I hope these people do the right thing
  • lyris
    Thank you Jimmy for your honesty.

    The problem has been the gop and corporatist Democrats and lieberman who have their pockets lined with corporation money, and care nothing of the American people. These people should be fired by the voters.
  • If the Dems would pass a "medicare for all" option now, that may turn the tide. The lame healthcare bill compromise, which hasn't delivered anything to the people yet, is almost impossible to sell. And even when the provisions kick in, the subsidies will probably melt away in the sun. Insurers certainly have plans in the drawer, enabling them to turn tax dollars into profits without improving their insurances at all. A public option add on, showing that the Dems really want to change the system, could avoid the slow motion train wreck, and be an important argument in the campaigns now. And under the impression of the horrible poll numbers, even blue dogs, who opposed it so far, may think twice!
  • lyris
    Try telling this to ben nelson, blanch lincoln, mary landrieu, lieberman, baucas, bayh and all of the gop. They only care about their pockets which are lined by corporation money.
  • AlanSmithee
    Your fatal assumption is that there is some daylight between the federal government and insurance corporations. There isn't. There will be no legislation passed by the two corporate-owned parties that will negatively affect the profit margin of insurance corporations. Anything else is ponies and rainbows.
  • lyris
    Besides the entire gop senate, there were only a few Democratic senators who were opposed to the public option.
  • AlanSmithee
    You had a tiny handful of representatives and maybe two or three senators. Your party is beyond corrupt. Put down the rainbow flavored kool-aid and deal with it already.
  • davidrvelasquez
    While your party pimps tax cuts for the rich, liability cuts for BP , refusal to extend unemployment benefits for hundreds of thousands of americans and refuse to tell the public their own alternative plan for economic recovery while dishing on the dems'.
    Who's trying to fool whom here?
    Both parties are compromised and there's no point in denying that.
    But yours takes the cake in greed, deception and corruption.
  • meowomon
    Sadly, I believe you are correct.
  • lyris
    You believe wrong meowomom, it was only a few Democratic senators who were opposed to the public option and medicare for all.
  • cameramandavid
    This is fantastic to see... now all it has to do is clear THREE hurdles... 1st: The Blue Dogs in the House... Let's assume it actually clears that... then 2nd, it runs into the Brick wall known as "Obstructionist GOP Senate Minority"... and if by some miracle it clears that... then it faces the Veto pen of our "Bipartisan pocket dweller of the Health Insurance Companies" President Obama.... who will still be extending the "Hand of Bipartisanship" into the wood chipper known as the GOP

    So basically.... good luck...
  • lyris
    The problem will be the lobbyists like armey who will ship in enough rednecks to turn D.C. into chaos again.

    I wonder if we had someone who would pay our way how many public options would show up in D.C.?
  • Lodewijk
    Very true. Woolsey's doing the right thing here, but she and the other sponsors are up against the health insurance, pharmaceutical, medical device, and hospital industries, who are very happy at the current Obamacare bill, since it forces everyone into their clutches.

    They've bought off the Blue Dogs in the House and Senate, they own the GOPukes, and as Obama just demonstrated, he put one of Wellpoint's henchwomen, who wrote the Health Insurance Reform Bill as part of Max Baucus's staff, in charge of implementing the new bill.

    Those are three huge hurdles. Huge.
  • lyris
    Are the health insurance really happy with the so called Obama care? Do you remember how we got what we got?

    Corporations are dirty and evil and fought to keep things the way they were. Now at least they are forced to put the majority of the money to actual health care and not bonuses. It's not what I wanted, but knowing that the big boys aren't getting their millions in bonuses makes me smile.
  • AlanSmithee
    There are no ponies or rainbows. The "big boys" will profit handsomely from the bill they wrote.
  • Praxman
    But it could be a nonstarter in the Senate this year

    Last time around it was a nonstarter in the Senate, as the Senate is a mystical citadel, protected by the mists of Time, where elven archers and dwarven axeman wage their Eternal War.
    Or vampires and werewolves.
    Or aristocracy....
  • You know that this is just a huge stroke--me session to get our whores buried in paper, so that they can continue to declare war on us.
  • F yeah!
  • ya_right
    All the more reason to keep the dems in the majority otherwise the repugs will kill, kill, kill it.

    VOTE THIS NOVEMBER. VOTE DEMOCRATIC.
  • i am voting for Rand Paul this year moron.
  • lyris
    You are correct ya_right. From your lips to God's and the American voters' ears.
  • AlanSmithee
    Hope for change!
  • meowomon
    I'm sorry, but I have almost given up hope. Our president has surrounded himself with DLC cockroaches who will try to force the progressives to back off. Sorry, but it is Democrats as usual: most of them have sold their souls to their corporate sponsors.
  • lyris
    He will make some changes.
  • AlanSmithee
    Gutting Social Security, for one. Is that a pony or a rainbow, Obot?
  • gundersonrogers
    Bingo!
  • you go girl - awright way to go !
    you can have my vote
    applauds accolades kudos
    high five
    and any other over the top positive exclamation of affirmation
  • you go girl
  • shag11
    I'm all for it, where do I sign up?
  • TJoad
    I think I read that approx. 70% of the voting public favors a Public Option. Sounds like a good thing for candidates of any party to run on, but I doubt the party of no will do anything besides pander to their corporate masters.
  • lyris
    ...And line their pockets.
  • cameramandavid
    wait for it.... if 70% of the voting populace is for it, then very soon, Fox News will be reporting that 70% of voters are AGAINST the public option... in Fox News World, Up is down, left is right, and of course... right is right.
  • worldtreker2004
    Tell me how do you think government is going to drive down the cost of Health Insurance when in every other industry they get involved in they make prices go up

    Your talking about the same Government that has devalued the dollar by 93% over the last 70 years. How bad do you think they will devalue your health care in 70 years
  • lyris
    Didn't read the health reform law did you?
  • DeadFed
    The FED is responsible for the devaluation of the dollar. Fractional Reserve trickery.
  • yeah, the government sure can't run a Post Office where letters cost 50 cents to send (and they WOULD turn a profit, if they weren't legally required to break even = no taxpayer support), the Gov't can't run the Army, Navy, Marines, etc, and it can't run a Pentagon. Community College? Gov't run, obviously that's no good. Roads, bridges, damns? Built by the gov't. they obviously won't work.

    No, let's give over all our vital services to the private sector, since they obviously don't need any oversight and they NEVER mess up. You know, a guy like you who is obviously so well informed ought to be running things, not these democratically elected public servants!
  • lyris
    Bravo Christian.
  • nedclark
    Worldtreker2004 evidently hasn't had to buy into the private health insurance market lately...

    My small business has seen its premiums jump nearly 60% over the last 3 years with NO illness claims, and massive ($4,800 per person) deductibles before the carrier pays one red cent. NO Gov't-run program I know of has see those types of increases.

    So to answer WT2004, I would LOVE to buy into Gov't-run insurance, if for no other reasons that they don't immediately skim 20%-30% for profit - or `reward' workers for denying claims.
  • lyris
    And while we didn't get the public option this time, the health insurance now has to put the majority of what we pay for health care into treatment for us, the big boys won't be getting the big bonuses they used to get.

    I suggest all of you read the law.
  • AlanSmithee
    I suggest you read the fucking bill already.
  • TJoad
    Tell me why your super duper Insurance Companies are afraid of a little competition with just an option to choose a Government run program. My insurance rates have more than quadrupled over the last 30 years and I get squat. I haven't been to the Doctor in 12 years...too busy working to pay for the insurance that covers nothing for the first $10,000. The greedy for profit paper pushers have ruined health care in the USA.
  • meowomon
    My super duper insurance company, United "Healthcare", wouldn't even give me the medicine I needed to save my sight. Luckily, the wonderful ophthalmologist I went to (who supports the public option 100%) had enough extra left over from patients who could afford better insurance. He had stored up these extras for people like me whose insurance company would let me go blind rather than paying for a $2000 injection. There's your super duper "profits before people" big assed health insurance corporation! They might as well have been a death panel for my eye!
  • lyris
    I'm so glad you had a kind and caring ophthalmologist. He's a wonderful example of what doctors should be. He's a keeper.
  • ladygeek
    I know exactly what you are talking about. My sister was a dairy farmer before Reagan privitized the dairy industry. I'm sure you can imagine catastrophic injuries in that line of work but even under Reagan they also had to pay the first 10K before they got any coverage. Forget dental insurance, life insurance, etc. - things that are usually provided by employers. Or at least, they used to do that. And, why do you think so many American companies move to Canada? How about a public option health care system. Just a thought.
  • TJoad
    What a stimulus to our economy it would be for businesses and individuals to have affordable health care.
  • lyris
    Yes it would. That and getting rid of NAFTA and all the other AFTA's.
  • jsixis
    I would rather give my money to the government then ANY insurance company
  • worldtreker2004
    Why, the government doesn't work for you they work for the people that get them elected and the banks that fund the debt. Get your head screwed on straight

    Don't tell me your one of those people that thinks you run the government because you get a vote so you can trust the people that are administering things because if they do bad you can get rid of them. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA and there are flying pink ponies too, BWHAHAHAHAHAHA
  • lyris
    Perhaps if you and others of your ilk actually looked at the facts we would have better elected officials.
  • AlanSmithee
    Sad. It's always someone else's fault, isn't it? The God-Emperor can do no wrong.
  • davidrvelasquez
    I'm surprised you're so obsessively against healthcare reform.
    I'd have thought any gov't subsidies for your medication would be useful.
    Atleast it appears that your Thorazine script is up.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Site Meter Site Meter Quantcast Quantcast