(AP) Six Muslim men removed from a plane last fall after being accused of suspicious behavior are
suing the airline
and threatening to sue the passengers who complained — a move some fear
could discourage travelers from speaking up when they see something
unusual.
The civil rights lawsuit, filed earlier this month, has so alarmed
some lawyers that they are offering to defend the unnamed “John Doe”
passengers listed as “possible defendants” free of charge. They say it
is vital that the flying public be able to report suspicious behavior
without fear of being dragged into court.
“When you drive up the road towards the airport, there's a big road
sign that says, `Report suspicious behavior,'” said Gerry Nolting, a
Minneapolis lawyer. “There's no disclaimer that adds, `But beware if
you do that, you might get sued.'”
The six imams were taken off a Phoenix-bound US Airways flight on
Nov. 20 while returning home from a conference of Islamic clerics in
Minneapolis.
Other passengers had gotten nervous when the men were seen praying
and chanting in Arabic as they waited to board. Some passengers also
said that the men spoke of Saddam Hussein and cursed the United States;
that they requested seat belt extenders with heavy buckles and stowed
them under their seats; that they were moving about and conferring with
each other during boarding; and that they sat separately in seats
scattered through the cabin.
The plane was cleared for a security sweep, nothing was found, and the jet took off without the imams.
The Muslim clerics say they were humiliated, and are seeking
unspecified damages from the airline, the Minneapolis airport and,
potentially, the John Does.
Omar Mohammedi, the New York City attorney for the imams, said the
intent is not to go after passengers who raise valid concerns about
security. But he suggested some passengers may have acted in bad faith
out of prejudice.
“As an attorney, I have seen a lot of abuse by the general public
when it comes to members of the community creating stories that do not
exist,” Mohammedi said.
He denied the imams were talking about Saddam, and said that their
seats were assigned and that they requested extenders because their
seat belts didn't fit.
Some fear such lawsuits could weaken what has become the first line
of defense against terrorism since Sept. 11 — an alert public. At
airports and train and subway stations around the country, travelers
are routinely warned to watch for unattended bags and suspicious
activity and to notify authorities.
Ellen Howe, spokeswoman for the Transportation Security
Administration, which oversees security at all U.S. airports, would not
comment specifically on the imams' lawsuit. But she said the TSA counts
on passengers to help the agency do its job.
“`See something, say something' is certainly a common mantra in
this day and age,” Howe said. “We would always remind passengers to be
both vigilant and thoughtful.”
In reaction to the imams' lawsuit, Congress has taken steps to
legally protect passengers who report suspicious activity. Earlier this
week, the House approved an amendment to a rail transportation security
bill that would make passengers immune from such lawsuits, unless they
say something they know is false.
Mohammedi said he has not yet identified any of the complaining
passengers. An airport police report listed a passenger and two US
Airways employees as complaining about the imams. All three had their
names blacked out before the lawsuit was filed by invoking a Minnesota
law that allows it, airport spokesman Pat Hogan said.
Nolting said he has been contacted by several potential John Does.
Passenger Pat Snelson, who lives in a Twin Cities suburb, said he
and his wife were not among those who reported suspicious behavior. But
he said his wife noticed the men praying, and he saw them moving around
the cabin while others were boarding.
“These guys were up to no good,” Snelson said. “We think the airport people did a real good job in taking care of it.”
Bomb-sniffing dogs examined the men and their baggage. FBI agents
and other federal law enforcement officers questioned the men for
several hours before releasing them.
Billie Vincent, a former director of security for the Federal
Aviation Administration, said he is troubled by the mere attempt to
identify the passengers who raised concerns.
Airline passengers “are your eyes and your ears,” said Vincent, who
now owns an aviation security company. “If attorneys can get those
names and sue them, you put a chilling effect on the whole system.”