Quantcast

Gulf Oil Spill: Cap Removed From Gushing Well, Oil Flows Freely

First Posted: 07-10-10 03:23 PM   |   Updated: 07-11-10 02:25 AM

What's Your Reaction?
Oil Cap
In this image taken from video provided by BP PLC, the arm of a remotely operated vehicle works at the Deepwater Horizon oil spill site in the Gulf of Mexico, Saturday, July 10, 2010. (AP)

NEW ORLEANS (AP) -- Robotic submarines working a mile underwater removed a leaking cap from the gushing Gulf oil well Saturday, starting a painful trade-off: Millions more gallons of crude will flow freely into the sea for at least two days until a new seal can be mounted to capture all of it.

There's no guarantee for such a delicate operation deep below the water's surface, officials said, and the permanent fix of plugging the well from the bottom remains slated for mid-August.

"It's not just going to be, you put the cap on, it's done. It's not like putting a cap on a tube of toothpaste," Coast Guard spokesman Capt. James McPherson said.

Robotic submarines removed the cap that had been placed on top of the leak in early June to collect the oil and send it to surface ships for collection or burning. BP aims to have the new, tighter cap in place as early as Monday and said that, as of Saturday night, the work was going according to plan.

If tests show it can withstand the pressure of the oil and is working, the Gulf region could get its most significant piece of good news since the April 20 explosion on the BP-leased Deepwater Horizon rig, which killed 11 workers.

"Over the next four to seven days, depending on how things go, we should get that sealing cap on. That's our plan," said Kent Wells, a BP senior vice president, of the round-the-clock operation.

It would be only a temporary solution to the catastrophe that the federal government estimates has poured between 87 million and 172 million gallons of oil into the Gulf as of Saturday. Hope for permanently plugging the leak lies with two relief wells, the first of which should be finished by mid-August.

With the cap removed Saturday at 12:37 p.m. CDT, oil flowed freely into the water, collected only by the Q4000 surface vessel, with a capacity of about 378,000 gallons. That vessel should be joined Sunday by the Helix Producer, which has more than double the Q4000's capacity.

Story continues below

But the lag could be long enough for as much as 5 million gallons to gush into already fouled waters. Officials said a fleet of large skimmers was scraping oil from the surface above the well site.

The process begun Saturday has two major phases: removing equipment currently on top of the leak and installing new gear designed to fully contain the flow of oil.

BP began trying Saturday afternoon to remove the bolted top flange that only partially completed the seal with the old cap. Video images showed robotic arms working to unscrew its bolts. Wells said that could last into Monday depending on whether the flange can be pulled off from above, as BP hopes. If not, a specially designed tool will be used to pry apart the top and bottom flanges.

Once the top flange is removed, BP has to bind together two sections of drill pipe that are in the gushing well head. Then a 12-foot-long piece of equipment called a flange transition spool will be lowered and bolted over it.

The second piece of pipe inside the well head came as something of a surprise, and raises the possibility that one of the sections of pipe became jammed in the Deepwater Horizon's blowout preventer, though which the well pipes run. The failure of the blowout preventer, a massive piece of equipment designed to stop the unchecked flow of oil, is partly to blame for the size of the spill.

"That will be an important question to ask when we pull the blowout preventer up to the surface and we'll figure out where that pipe ultimately landed," Wells said.

After the flange transition spool is bolted in place, the new cap - called a capping stack or "Top Hat 10" - can be lowered. The equipment, weighing some 150,000 pounds, is designed to fully seal the leak and provide connections for new vessels on the surface to collect oil. The cap has valves that can restrict the flow of oil and shut it in, if it can withstand the enormous pressure.

That will be one of the key items for officials to monitor, said Paul Bommer, a professor of petroleum engineering at the University of Texas at Austin.

"If the new cap does work and they shut the well in, it is possible that part of the well could rupture if the pressure inside builds to an unacceptable value," Bommer wrote in an e-mail Saturday.

Ultimately, BP wants to have four vessels collecting oil within two or three weeks of the new cap's installation. If the new cap doesn't work, BP is ready to place a backup similar the old one on top of the leak.

The government estimates 1.5 million to 2.5 million gallons of oil a day are spewing from the well, and the previous cap collected about 1 million gallons of that. With the new cap and the new containment vessel, the system will be capable of capturing 2.5 million to 3.4 million gallons - essentially all the leaking oil, officials said.

The plan, which was accelerated to take advantage of a window of good weather lasting seven to 10 days, didn't inspire confidence in the residents of the oil-slicked coast.

"This is probably the sixth or seventh method they've tried, so, no, I'm not optimistic," said Deano Bonano, director of emergency preparedness for Jefferson Parish.

On Saturday he was inspecting beaches at Grand Isle lined with protective boom and bustling with heavy equipment used to scoop up and clean stained sand.

"Even if they turn it off today, we'll still be here at least another six weeks, on watch for the oil," he said.

"Shutting off the oil is a very important step, but we should not assume this disaster is over," said Larry Schweiger, president of the National Wildlife Federation. "I think it's important to recognize that there's an enormous amount of oil still in the Gulf."

---

Associated Press Writer Holbrook Mohr in Belle Chase, La. contributed to this report.

Get HuffPost Green On Twitter, Facebook, and Google Buzz!
NEW ORLEANS (AP) -- Robotic submarines working a mile underwater removed a leaking cap from the gushing Gulf oil well Saturday, starting a painful trade-off: Millions more gallons of crude will flow f...
NEW ORLEANS (AP) -- Robotic submarines working a mile underwater removed a leaking cap from the gushing Gulf oil well Saturday, starting a painful trade-off: Millions more gallons of crude will flow f...
Filed by Hunter Stuart  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
728
Pending Comments
3
View FAQ
You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Next ›  Last »   (17 pages total)
Show: 
photo

HUFFPOST SUPER USER

Kurt Mundt   0 minute ago (2:27 AM)
I see in wikipedia that the longest lasting oil " gusher" was in California in the 1930, and that it spewed over 18 million gallons of oil on dry land. No surprise this high pressure gusher in the Gulf is on-going - no surprise, but great sadness. Deep-water drilling is encountering extreme conditions. They barely know enough to drill the hole but not enough to stop it under a mile of water and unknown pressures beneath. It least it's warm down there - imagine this in Alaskan waters.
photo
Sixtracks   1 minute ago (2:26 AM)
BP is full of it.
Until ALL is restored that they destroyed, there will be no slack for them.
Why should there be? They cover up, lie, and are putting Americans in harms way.
Money before People. But, as Geo W Bush said: "Money trumps peace"
photo

HUFFPOST SUPER USER

VanTroi   1 minute ago (2:26 AM)
crime of the century to the environment
photo
Stanley Bianco   2 minutes ago (2:25 AM)
Keep pumping it out boys!!
We should get that cap and trade bill pushed in any day now.
photo
GonzoBrawler   11 minutes ago (2:16 AM)
I'm hoping, & wishing for the best, but I simply do not trust a single word that BP says. From the very begining of this catastrophe, they have been lying out their @sses, trying only to protect themselves, and their interests. They also need to be held accountable for the laws they broke, which was what caused this in the first place. They were trying to save money by cutting corners on safety, and killed 11 people, and caused the worst environmental disaster in history. It would be an insult to the people and all the animals that died, and to all the people whose lives were destroyed if BP isnt charged for their crimes.
photo
dobberdoss   6 minutes ago (2:21 AM)
won't happen while the government continues to protect them also using the local coastguard and police
graymatters   4 minutes ago (2:23 AM)
I have no problem with what you are saying. The other side you are forgetting about is the government and all the red tape that has caused so much inaction.

Denying permits to build berms to determine if it will ruin the wildlife???? Having the coast guard docking the boats for inspections?? Seriously what is worse putting up sand berms and not letting the oil reach the marshes or doing an environmental study while the oil drowns the wildlife??
SwingingFromCenter   17 minutes ago (2:09 AM)
Gotta love these "We're gonna rail against BP no matter what they do" headlines.

If they didn't replace the cap with this new one that will hopefully end the leak, everybody would be getting on them about the present cap not getting all of it. If they have to take a little time to replace the cap with one that will, there's a headline getting on them for letting the oil gush unabated while they replace it.

Apparently they needed to come up with a way to make it instantaneous.
photo
calindi   14 minutes ago (2:12 AM)
Yes, that's right.
I'm not gonna give those weasels any peace.
They are responsible here, and if anyone thinks for one second that we all shouldn't be on them like flies on doodie then I don't know what.
They effed this up. I hope those jerks squirm and keep squirming.
You want me to be fair to them??? Good luck.
NoSillyName   12 minutes ago (2:15 AM)
80-some days is well beyond instantaneous.
SwingingFromCenter   2 minutes ago (2:25 AM)
But it's not 80 some days. It's off today, and the new one on on Monday. You and I are talking about 2 wholly different things.
photo
dobberdoss   4 minutes ago (2:23 AM)
We owe BP NOTHING! over this, They have lied and manipulated and covered up (literally) the whole way through. Screw them!
SwingingFromCenter   1 minute ago (2:26 AM)
Congratulations on missing the entire point.

My point was if they left the old cap on, you'd be on them for leaving the old cap on. But if they take it off for a couple of days to put a better one on, you get on them for doing that, too.
photo
Icky Sticky   23 minutes ago (2:04 AM)
The Russians were smarter than to use a deep water rig to drill down 35,000 feet into a 100,000 lbs psi super cavity of methane pressurized oil. No rig is capable of handling those pressures. BP had already abandoned wells prior to the Horizon because the pressure eviscerated their equipment, yet they continued to attempt new shafts. The reason they can't and won't cap it and keep uncapping it is because they need relief valves, so to speak, or the pressure may build up and cause a volatile cavitation explosion. This would be like a Mt. St. Helens, underwater methane explosion. Possibility from this scenario would be a 500 mph tsunami towards Florida, and/or severe decrease in water buoyancy, sinking all vessels and rigs in a wide ranging area.

The reason the oil pressure has not dissipated in 80 odd days is because this oil cavity could be of an abiotic, not fossil fuels, origin. Abiotic oil is caused by pressure and chemical reactions, not from decayed, organic materials. Call it prehistoric oil, created BEFORE life and decaying animals and vegetation. Remember in science class how the earth was super hot then cooled? Well, there are still magma hot pockets where this oil is being self generated from that process.

The other equation to factor in is that this prehistoric oil has effects on tectonic plate shifting. This depressurization caused by man could upset the balance and cause tectonic shifting resulting in possible earthquakes, tsunami's and worse.
foolonthehill   21 minutes ago (2:06 AM)
Would that explain the wierd red color of this oil?
photo
Icky Sticky   11 minutes ago (2:16 AM)
According to this one possible answer, I'm assuming the professor tends to think the oil has an organic component as in fossil fuel relationships, however, there is vegetation at the seabed floor. This doesn't necessarily mean that the origin of the oil itself is organic based, however.

“We believe that the reddish brown color is indicative of the formation of a water-in-oil emulsion, called a mousse. These [oil slicks] typically have colors other than black, but with this oil, the colors are fairly vivid. We still don't know the exact cause of the color change but it probably as something to do with the water/asphaltene interactions,” explains Louisiana State University professor emeritus Edward Overton. He adds that asphaltene compounds are essentially remnants of the green plant pigment called chlorophyll, and that the chemicals make up an important part of the crude oil.
Sejjr   15 minutes ago (2:12 AM)
I thought the abiotic oil theory was debunked.
photo
Icky Sticky   5 minutes ago (2:21 AM)
Of course there are some that want you to believe that. Think about it though. It is highly unlikely there are remnants of dinosaur bones 35,000 feet deep, nor decaying vegetation in a magma hot, 100,000 lbs psi environment. The Russians have long since known about abiotic oil. But, if the oil industry let you know that oil is not finite, they couldn't extort the world like they do. Of course the misinformation on this would be severe. The earth itself creates oil. I believe it was doing this long before life even formed.
photo

HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR

AllenD   9 minutes ago (2:18 AM)
There is so much misinformation in this post I don't know where to start. Abiotic oil is a myth perpetrated by those who refuse to believe that our petroleum resources are finite. As for your disaster movie prediction of a Mt. St Helens type methane explosion, maybe Hollywood will make a summer blockbuster out of it next year.

Of course, you could educate yourself: http://www.theoildrum.com/
Roses4Me   7 minutes ago (2:20 AM)
Could this be the beginning of , or partial cause of, the 12-21-2012 doomsday predicted
by so many ancient cultures? Any Thoughts?
photo
RussT   24 minutes ago (2:03 AM)
Drill Baby Drill!!!!
photo
Icky Sticky   18 minutes ago (2:08 AM)
Evidently you think being an id!ot is something cute. People in the Gulf region risk long term health deterioration from the Hydrogen Sulfide, Benzene, Dichloromethane (DCM or methylene chloride) from Corexit... all as a consequence of "Drill baby Drill.

Not to mention the scenario I've described in other posts.

Willful ignorance is nothing clever or cute.
photo
calindi   18 minutes ago (2:09 AM)
we got it, Russ...
photo

HUFFPOST SUPER USER

chuck prebys   26 minutes ago (2:01 AM)
Why not?
It's BP's gulf.......
BP's world.
Literally.
What are us simple non-incorporated humans going to do about it?

It's THEIR nest to foul............and stick us with the fiat-money bill.........

Hahahahahahahahahahahaa............

When will you people feel strongly enough to take up arms against these defilers?
photo

HUFFPOST SUPER USER

SilentSolidarity   24 minutes ago (2:03 AM)
And who are you? Jesus?
photo

HUFFPOST SUPER USER

chuck prebys   2 minutes ago (2:24 AM)
Working on it

HUFFPOST SUPER USER

J G   27 minutes ago (2:00 AM)
If we had paid attention and the government had insisted we develop alternative energy after the early 70's oil scare, we would have had a solution, if not several solutions, by now. Remember when Carter put solar panels on the White House roof? He was either ignored or laughed at. Reagan dismantled them. See a pattern?
foolonthehill   22 minutes ago (2:04 AM)
But nobody has put them back up there since, have they? Not the Bushes or Clinton or Obama.

Obama should do it just for the symbolism. Wonder why Clinton-Gore didn't?

HUFFPOST SUPER USER

J G   20 minutes ago (2:07 AM)
Good point.
photo

HUFFPOST SUPER USER

chuck prebys   0 minute ago (2:27 AM)
Yea
That's the obvious.
What about the thousands of patents and processes bought up and shelved by BigOil©™?

What are the !d!ot murrikans amazed by a car that gets 40 mpg when cars got 40 mpg in 1978?

Yea
The jokes on US
US
for not looking behind the curtain and seeing it's all been a giant fr@ud
photo
Snapper Snap   27 minutes ago (1:59 AM)
Obama should have told them to put that cap on to begin with.

Obama = failure
photo
freeforall1   27 minutes ago (2:00 AM)
Snapper Snap = FAIL
wordherd   24 minutes ago (2:02 AM)
Sigh
photo
Snapper Snap   24 minutes ago (2:02 AM)
Oh wait.

It's Bush's fault that they didn't put the cap on to begin with.....sorry...forgot.
photo

HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR

AllenD   23 minutes ago (2:04 AM)
Please explain how they could have done this days after the accident if they have spent the last couple of months building it. Please specify the more difficult tasks that ROVs have performed. Please explain how how oil and gas would not have blasted straight up a new riser and blown up the ship/rig installing it.

From http://www.theoildrum.com/node/6714/673318
photo
Franklin1776   21 minutes ago (2:06 AM)
tr0ll=failure.

Maybe obama could have used some of that free market, don't regulate anything magic to plug the hole.
photo
jan4insight   7 minutes ago (2:20 AM)
x2
photo

HUFFPOST SUPER USER

Dukedraven   29 minutes ago (1:57 AM)
This is painful. The nightmare keeps on going.
photo

HUFFPOST SUPER USER

Carolab   31 minutes ago (1:56 AM)
So they are using paper towels to clean the marshes.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2010/07/10/us/10spill-cnd/10spill-cnd-popup.jpg

Please tell me why the above article says 1.5 to 2.5 million gallons a day and this NYT article dated today says 35,000 to 60,000 barrels.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/10/us/10spill.html?_r=2&hp
foolonthehill   28 minutes ago (1:58 AM)
Probably because gallons are not barrels. Don't recall how many gallons in a barrel but that's probably why.
Sejjr   19 minutes ago (2:08 AM)
42 I believe
photo

HUFFPOST SUPER USER

SilentSolidarity   17 minutes ago (2:10 AM)
We wouldn't have this debate if liter was our standard. :) True. A million gallons sounds worse than "only" 35,000 -60,000 barrels. But both sources pretty much state the same.

1 oil barrel = 158.98 liters = 42 gallons.

42 x 32,000 = 1,344,000 gallons
42 x 60,000 = 2,525,000 gallons
photo

HUFFPOST SUPER USER

Carolab   8 minutes ago (2:19 AM)
The answer is what you said: a million gallons SOUNDS WORSE than 35,000 - 60,000 barrels.

I am so SICK of this game.
foolonthehill   3 minutes ago (2:24 AM)
Well, they could have gone metric and done litres for super-maximum shock effect.

Either way, its bad.
photo

HUFFPOST SUPER USER

scarletxoxoxo   33 minutes ago (1:54 AM)
Humans are disgusting.

Twitter Edition