Traffic plunges for Google+ as 60% of users log off

By Meghan Keneally

Last updated at 10:55 PM on 8th October 2011

Google has tried a number of different approaches, but none seem to get enough people to 'like' their social networking program, Google+.

By keeping it's new social networking invite-only, Google was hoping to amp up anticipation of Google+.

That didn't work, so they opened up the cyber gates to allow any and all people to join.

Losing friends: Google+ has lost 60 per cent of active users since the programme was opened to the public on September 20

Losing friends: Google+ has lost 60 per cent of active users since the programme was opened to the public on September 20

Initially, that seemed like it worked: traffic to the site jumped 1,200 per cent over the course of one day.

Since that free-for-all on September 20, the site's traffic dropped down by a massive 60 per cent.

Given Google's typical strength when it comes to launching new products, the fact that the web behemoth's social media arm is struggling to find stable footing comes as a surprise.

Web analytic firm Chitika released a report Friday that offers a possible reason for the flagging numbers.

'The supply of users for social media sites is limited. To survive you must stand out and provide a service that others do not,' the report reads.

Confident: Google CEO Eric Schmidt thinks that there is a enough to differentiate Google+ with it's clear competitor Facebook

Confident: Google CEO Eric Schmidt thinks that there is a enough to differentiate Google+ with it's clear competitor Facebook

The obvious problem for Google+ comes in the form of Facebook, which has 800 million active users.

In spite of the clear similarities, Google CEO Eric Schmidt thinks that there are finite differences that make the two products stand apart.

'Now we have a product called Google Plus, which is doing extremely well, which looks like a worthwhile competitor in a slightly different space, with more privacy controls, for example, than Facebook,' Mr Schmidt said in an interview with PBS.

Additions to the social media tool, including new +1 buttons next to all Google search results to help increase synergy between Google's search function and Google+, as well as introducing a 'hangouts' section of the Google+ site, have helped to keep users interested.

 

That said, Chitika says that it must keep up the changes.

'Perhaps if Google can accelerate their current pace of innovation on their social network offering, Google+ could becoming a competitive alternative to its arch-rival, Facebook,' the report says.

'Otherwise, given Facebook's clout and reputation of rapid innovation, Google+ might just be left in the dust.'

 

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below, or debate this issue live on our message boards.

The comments below have not been moderated.

Google has snubbed their large base of dedicated users -- those who use Google Apps for their domain. These users are unable to create a profile and thus have access to Google+. Moreover, Google has lacked the simple courtesy of giving any timetable for when it will be available. Instead, when they have acknowledged the issue (rare), they give only vague, non-specific answers. Very poor. Much enthusiasm of those who would have been dependable users and evangelists has been lost.

Click to rate     Rating   3

I do not understand how they can be competitive, just want everything all under him to adjust, to have the whole world, power over all, but ultimately just as we are interested in their customers.

Click to rate     Rating   3

Problem is that it won't be understood by oiks (like the two below who couldn't work it out). It's a smart social website but since Facebook upped its game, it now doesn't offer any clear USPs (i.e. for Google's Circles, Facebook now has lists). With Facebook's new timeline coming out soon, Google + will unfortunately become a bit of a analogue has-been.

Click to rate     Rating   1

You see Facebook has saturated the market.It's full of drips.Is that right Harinder..

Click to rate     Rating   1

@Harinder I'm 39 and I teach my younger colleges (20+) how to use facebook, twitter, do not judge by age if you're not one of them.

Click to rate     Rating   6

Trouble with Google is, they have created a 'creepy spying' culture, where users now starting to understand why a lot of things Google do are free, because they sell your info on for advertising purpose to make monies, this creepy practice are only matched by Facebook. The problem with Google Plus are, first, the name, like any marketing machine, wrong name to a product is almost a death sentence, second, content, its confusing, the are trying to do too much, and lastly, privacy, asking a user for their phone no. when signing up automatically set the privacy alarm bell ringing, and ringing loud, users are no longer as naive as they were 5+ years ago when Facebook first came to the market, they now know a lot more about their info sold on for gains.

Click to rate     Rating   15

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Your name and location will appear next to your comment.
You have 1000 characters left.
We welcome your opinions. This is a public forum. Libellous and abusive comments are not allowed. Please read our House Rules.
For information about privacy and cookies please read our Privacy Policy.
Terms