CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — One night late in 1979, an itinerant young physicist named Alan Guth, with a new son and a year’s appointment at Stanford, stayed up late with his notebook and equations, venturing far beyond the world of known physics.
He was trying to understand why there was no trace of some exotic particles that should have been created in the Big Bang. Instead he discovered what might have made the universe bang to begin with. A potential hitch in the presumed course of cosmic evolution could have infused space itself with a special energy that exerted a repulsive force, causing the universe to swell faster than the speed of light for a prodigiously violent instant.
If true, the rapid engorgement would solve paradoxes like why the heavens look uniform from pole to pole and not like a jagged, warped mess. The enormous ballooning would iron out all the wrinkles and irregularities. Those particles were not missing, but would be diluted beyond detection, like spit in the ocean.
“SPECTACULAR REALIZATION,” Dr. Guth wrote across the top of the page and drew a double box around it.
On Monday, Dr. Guth’s starship came in. Radio astronomers reported that they had seen the beginning of the Big Bang, and that his hypothesis, known undramatically as inflation, looked right.
Reaching back across 13.8 billion years to the first sliver of cosmic time with telescopes at the South Pole, a team of astronomers led by John M. Kovac of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics detected ripples in the fabric of space-time — so-called gravitational waves — the signature of a universe being wrenched violently apart when it was roughly a trillionth of a trillionth of a trillionth of a second old. They are the long-sought smoking-gun evidence of inflation, proof, Dr. Kovac and his colleagues say, that Dr. Guth was correct.
Inflation has been the workhorse of cosmology for 35 years, though many, including Dr. Guth, wondered whether it could ever be proved.
If corroborated, Dr. Kovac’s work will stand as a landmark in science comparable to the recent discovery of dark energy pushing the universe apart, or of the Big Bang itself. It would open vast realms of time and space and energy to science and speculation.
Confirming inflation would mean that the universe we see, extending 14 billion light-years in space with its hundreds of billions of galaxies, is only an infinitesimal patch in a larger cosmos whose extent, architecture and fate are unknowable. Moreover, beyond our own universe there might be an endless number of other universes bubbling into frothy eternity, like a pot of pasta water boiling over.
In our own universe, it would serve as a window into the forces operating at energies forever beyond the reach of particle accelerators on Earth and yield new insights into gravity itself. Dr. Kovac’s ripples would be the first direct observation of gravitational waves, which, according to Einstein’s theory of general relativity, should ruffle space-time.
According to inflation theory, the waves are the hypothetical quantum particles, known as gravitons, that carry gravity, magnified by the expansion of the universe to extragalactic size.
“You can see how the sky is being distorted by gravitational waves,” said Andrei Linde, a prominent inflation theorist at Stanford. “We are using our universe as a big microscope. The sky is a photographic plate.”
Marc Kamionkowski of Johns Hopkins University, an early-universe expert who was not part of the team, said, “This is huge, as big as it gets.”
“Although I might not fully understand it,” Dr. Kamionkowski said, “this is a signal from the very earliest universe, sending a telegram encoded in gravitational waves."
The ripples manifested themselves as faint spiral patterns in a bath of microwave radiation that permeates space and preserves a picture of the universe when it was 380,000 years old and as hot as the surface of the Sun.
Dr. Kovac and his collaborators, working in an experiment known as Bicep, for Background Imaging of Cosmic Extragalactic Polarization, reported their results in a scientific briefing at the Center for Astrophysics here on Monday and in a set of papers submitted to The Astrophysical Journal.
Dr. Kovac said the chance that the results were a fluke was only one in 3.5 million — a gold standard of discovery called five-sigma.
Dr. Guth pronounced himself “bowled over,” saying he had not expected such a definite confirmation in his lifetime.
“With nature, you have to be lucky,” he said. “Apparently we have been lucky.”
The results are the closely guarded distillation of three years’ worth of observations and analysis. Eschewing email for fear of a leak, Dr. Kovac personally delivered drafts of his work to a select few, meeting with Dr. Guth, who is now a professor at M.I.T. (as is his son, Larry, who was sleeping that night in 1979), in his office last week.
“It was a very special moment, and one we took very seriously as scientists,” said Dr. Kovac, who chooses his words as carefully as he tends his radio telescopes.
Dr. Linde, who first described the most popular variant of inflation, known as chaotic inflation, in 1983, was about to go on vacation in the Caribbean last week when Chao-Lin Kuo, a Stanford colleague and a member of Dr. Kovac’s team, knocked on his door with a bottle of Champagne to tell him the news.
Confused, Dr. Linde called out to his wife, asking if she had ordered Champagne.
“And then I told him that in the beginning we thought that this was a delivery but we did not think that we ordered anything, but I simply forgot that actually I did order it, 30 years ago,” Dr. Linde wrote in an email.
Calling from Bonaire, the Dutch Caribbean island, Dr. Linde said he was still hyperventilating. “Having news like this is the best way of spoiling a vacation,” he said.
By last weekend, as social media was buzzing with rumors that inflation had been seen and news spread, astrophysicists responded with a mixture of jubilation and caution.
Abraham Loeb, a Harvard-Smithsonian astronomer who was not part of the team, said: “It looks like inflation really took place. Since 1980, this was really speculative physics.”
Max Tegmark, a cosmologist at M.I.T., wrote in an email, “I think that if this stays true, it will go down as one of the greatest discoveries in the history of science.” He added, “It’s a sensational breakthrough involving not only our cosmic origins, but also the nature of space.”
Michael S. Turner, a cosmologist at the University of Chicago, hailed it as the kind of discovery that could lead eventually to resolving riddles like dark matter and dark energy, writing in an email, “I am starting to feel like a 20-something-year-old postdoc!”
Lawrence M. Krauss of Arizona State and others also emphasized the need for confirmation, noting that the new results exceeded earlier estimates based on temperature maps of the cosmic background by the European Space Agency’s Planck satellite and other assumptions about the universe.
“So we will need to wait and see before we jump up and down,” Dr. Krauss said.
Corroboration might not be long in coming. The Planck spacecraft, which has been making exquisite measurements of the Big Bang microwaves, will be reporting its own findings this year. At least a dozen other teams are attempting similar measurements from balloons, mountaintops and space.
SPIRALS IN THE SKY
Gravity waves are the latest and deepest secret yet pried out of the cosmic microwaves, which were discovered accidentally by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson, both then at Bell Labs, 50 years ago. They got the Nobel Prize.
Dr. Kovac has spent his whole career trying to read the secrets of these waves. He is one of four leaders of Bicep, which has operated a series of increasingly sensitive radio telescopes at the South Pole, where the air — thin, cold and dry — creates ideal observing conditions. The others are Clement Pryke of the University of Minnesota, Jamie Bock of the California Institute of Technology and Dr. Kuo of Stanford.
“The South Pole is the closest you can get to space and still be on the ground,” Dr. Kovac said. He has been there 23 times, he said, wintering over in 1994. “I’ve been hooked ever since,” he said.
In 2002, he was part of a team that discovered that the microwave radiation was polarized, meaning the light waves had a slight preference to vibrate in one direction rather than another.
This was a step toward the ultimate goal of detecting the gravitational waves from inflation. Such waves, squeezing space in one direction and stretching it in another as they go by, would twist the direction of polarization of the microwaves, theorists said. As a result, maps of the polarization in the sky should have little arrows going in spirals.
Detecting those spirals required measuring infinitesimally small differences in the temperature of the microwaves. The group’s telescope, Bicep2, is basically a giant superconducting thermometer.
“We had no expectations what we would see,” Dr. Kovac said. The earlier Planck study had concluded that a parameter r, which is a measure of the swirliness of the polarization, could not be higher than 0.11, which would have knocked many popular versions of inflation. But it was not a direct measurement, as the Bicep team was attempting.
The Bicep measurement of r clocked in at nearly twice that, 0.20, putting the most favored models back into contention.
The strength of the signal surprised the researchers, and they spent a year burning up time on a Harvard supercomputer, making sure they had things right and worrying that competitors might beat them to the breakthrough.
A SPECIAL TIME
The data traced the onset of inflation to a time in cosmic history that physicists like Dr. Guth, staying up late in his Palo Alto house 35 years ago, suspected was a special break point in the evolution of the universe.
Physicists recognize four forces at work in the world today: gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces. But they have long suspected that those are simply different manifestations of a single unified force that ruled the universe in its earliest, hottest moments.
As the universe cooled, according to this theory, there was a fall from grace, not unlike some old folk mythology of gods or brothers falling out with each other. The laws of physics evolved, with one force after another “freezing out,” or splitting away.
That was where Dr. Guth came in.
Under some circumstances, a glass of water can stay liquid as the temperature falls below 32 degrees, until it is disturbed, at which point it will rapidly freeze, releasing latent heat in the process.
Similarly, the universe could “supercool” and stay in a unified state too long. In that case, space itself would become temporarily imbued with a mysterious kind of latent heat, or energy.
Inserted into Einstein’s equations, the latent energy would act as a kind of antigravity, and the universe would blow itself up. Since it was space itself supplying the repulsive force, the more space was created, the harder it pushed apart. In a runaway explosion, what would become our observable universe mushroomed in size at least a trillion trillionfold — from a submicroscopic speck of primordial energy to the size of a grapefruit — in less than a cosmic eye-blink.
Almost as quickly, this energy would decay into ordinary particles and radiation that were already in sync, despite how far apart they wound up, because they had all sprung from such a tiny primordial point, as if the galaxies had gotten together in the locker room to make a plan before going out. All of normal cosmic history was still ahead, resulting in today’s observable universe, a patch of sky and stars 14 billion light-years across.
“It’s often said that there is no such thing as a free lunch,” Dr. Guth likes to say, “but the universe might be the ultimate free lunch.”
Make that free lunches. Most of the hundred or so models that have been spawned by Dr. Guth’s original vision suggest that inflation, once started, is eternal. Even as our own universe settled down to a comfortable homey expansion with atoms, stars and planets, the rest of the cosmos will continue blowing up, spinning off other bubbles here and there endlessly, a concept known as the multiverse.
The Bicep data does not reveal what this magical-sounding inflating energy is. Antigravity might sound crazy, but it was Einstein who first raised the possibility of its permeating space in the form of a fudge factor called the cosmological constant, which he later abandoned as a blunder. It was revived with the discovery 15 years ago that something called dark energy is giving a boost to the expansion of the universe, albeit far more gently than inflation did.
So the future of the cosmos is perhaps bright and fecund, but do not bother asking about going any deeper into the past.
As Dr. Guth will be the first to say, we might never know what happened before inflation, at the very beginning, because inflation erases everything that came before it. All the chaos and randomness of the primordial moment are swept away, forever out of our view.
“If you trace your cosmic roots,” Dr. Loeb said, “you wind up at inflation.”
122 Comments
Ignacio Gotz
Point Harbor, NC 1 hour agoMany years ago I team-taught with a scientist, Dr. Jerome Notkin, who reported on the work of a physicist friend of his who maintained that there were anomalies in the measurement of Galileo's experiments with the feather and the cannon ball: the cannon ball, in fact, fell at a slower rate than the feather. The experiment was replicated several times to compensate for the inadequacies of old measuring systems, but always with the same result. This led the scientist to postulate the existence of an antigravitational force at work, which, of course, he could not prove. But now, apparently, it has been shown to exist. This, of course, is exhilarating. I can barely understand all this, but I am flabbergasted. It's not just that such a thing as antigravity exists, but that WE can see it.
Bruce Rozenblit
Kansas City 1 hour agoThis is one of he greatest scientific discoveries of modern times! I am pumped! As a lay person, but serious student of cosmology, I have read many books that demonstrated the validity of the unification of forces, except for gravity. That has always been the big mystery. Physicists have had high confidence for years in the equations that tie the forces together, as they work backwards in time, then everything would fall apart when they got to the precise instant after the big bang. That's where the gravity problem falls out. This discovery opens the door to fully understanding what gravity is and how it works.
I am super excited to see that Einstein continues to be validated. Even his cosmic constant idea, which he thought was wrong, has turned out to be correct. He may prove out to be the greatest scientist of all time.
This discovery also leads to a definition of space. It allows us to better understand not just matter, but the nature of the void that matter exists within.
Guess what else! According to Einstein's relativity, space and time are locked together. One cannot exist without the other. If we fully understand space, then we can fully understand time.
We are on the cusp of finally solving the mystery of existence itself! I can't wait for the NOVA special and the companion book.
David Underwood
is a trusted commenter Citrus Heights 1 hour agoThe question then, is if there is a universe beyond the one we can observe, what separates them? What keeps them apart?
Is the universe we see, just the result of a singularity, and we are confined within it? Now suppose you are 14 billion light years from earth, looking at the universe about you, what will you see? Theoretically, the universe has no center and no edge, so can we assume that anyone those 14 billion light years from us, will see the universe the same as we see it, a cosmos of receding galaxies by the billions?
Then by definition, the universe is, "The sum total of that which exists." If it is not, then it can not be called the universe, as that leads to equivocation, it will have to be renamed in order to avoid confusion. Or are they saying whatever else exists beyond our universe, has a different existence?
As we have seen, these cosmologists, make up all kinds of possibilities to explain their theories. But that the big bang inflated faster than the speed of light, seems to be a made up explanation, to keep their theory in check.
alexander hamilton
new york 1 hour agoI have always found these theoretical constructs unsatisfying on many levels. My poor human mind can't comprehend that something microscopic "inflated" to the size of a grapefruit in a trillionth of a trillionth of a trillionth of a second. Sounds like a guess gussied up as math to me. (Is the formula more reliable than the ones being used to predict the rate of global warming?) And this grapefruit contained enough matter and energy to eventually create billions of galaxies. Where was this grapefruit sitting, exactly? On some god's desk? On the floor? What was around it? Why did it start out as something microscopic? Where was this speck before inflation began? How long was it around? Where did all the stuff in it come from? Too much theory. I need more pictures and sensible plot lines. Carl Sagan and Alan Alda, where are you when I need you?
Damianos Damianopoulos
Corfu-Greece 1 hour agoAnd yet the most important challenge would be just that: find out what there was before the "cosmic egg" and the Big Bang. Is that point where science stops and religion begins? I think not, but we are so small and powerless to unfurl the mysteries of the uni/multiverse.
TC
DC 59 minutes agoThe analogy of the glass of water is a good explanation. It would appear that there were two impossible states of nature coexisting in the same place--the supercool state which was timeless and the latent heat state which was moving at the speed of light. The combination of these two states timeless and speed of light coinciding at the same nexus created the condition of anti-gravity and the blow up. It's like meeting your past and present and future self at the same instant--something's gotta give.
Bob Anderson
Westfield, NJ 57 minutes agoThis is an excellent article about a momentous set of developments. The question underlying all of it is, of course, "Why is there something rather than nothing?" And as exciting it is to find that 'inflation' has been virtually verified, we still have no answer to that question. The big bang theory and subsequent rapid inflation is not a theory of the creation of the universe; it is an explanation of what happened AFTER 'creation.' In a very real sense the existence of the universe itself remains a religious question (though not necessarily one subject to any particular doctrinal perspective).
Alan
Hawaii 55 minutes agoThis article gave me shivers of excitement and awe as I read it. While other Earthly issues certainly are important, and human suffering at a personal scale should never be forgotten, I found myself wishing that -- for a day, at least -- this discovery were the lead story with a bold, banner headline. Perhaps the perspective of a multiverse will help us be better in our treatment of each other, here, together.
TS
California 54 minutes agoAs a marine scientist, it is always exciting to me when other scientists advance their fields forward. In fact, it excites me when anyone find validation from their work. However, when I read the cynical responses some have to this article, I'm brought back down to Earth again. Science is often hard, very hard, but very rewarding. However, communicating science to the cynical, closed minds of those who don't want to be inspired is the probably even harder than the science itself. A paradox that has long thrilled me is the act of using the human brain to understand itself (neuroscience). Yet cynics draw nothing from the wonder of that, and they are of the same mentality as people who have nothing positive to say about this work. Three cheers to those who bring us this wonderful achievement, and three jeers to those who draw nothing from it.
Jay D.
52 minutes ago
The most exciting implication of inflation (if confirmed) is that it also confirms Prof. Dave Jennings' theory that "one tiny atom in my fingernail could be one little tiny universe."
It truly is a wonderous age in which we live.
122 Comments