Deadline nears: Shutdown looms without agreement

People walk in the rain on the National Mall in Washington, Friday, April 8, 2011, toward the Capitol as Congress continues to debate in hopes of avoi AP – People walk in the rain on the National Mall in Washington, Friday, April 8, 2011, toward the Capitol …
Related Quotes
Symbol Price Change
^DJI 12,380.05 -29.44
^GSPC 1,328.17 -5.34
^IXIC 2,780.42 -15.72
AdChoices

WASHINGTON – The federal government lurched toward a shutdown for the first time in 15 years on Friday as Republicans and Democrats in Congress struggled for a way out and swapped increasingly incendiary charges over which side was to blame.

The Obama administration readied hundreds of thousands of furlough notices for federal workers, to be released if no deal was reached by a midnight deadline to keep operations running.

"We know the whole world is watching us today," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and into the night the two sides were still swapping proposals from opposite wings of the Capitol in search of an elusive agreement.

Republicans placed the House on standby for a late-night vote, in case a decision was made to seek a stopgap bill to keep the government running for a few days to allow more time for negotiations.

Reid, President Barack Obama and House Speaker John Boehner all agreed a shutdown posed risks to an economy still recovering from the worst recession in decades. But there were disagreements aplenty among the principal players in an early test of divided government — Obama in the White House, fellow Democrats in control in the Senate and a new, tea party-flavored Republican majority in the House.

For much of the day, Reid and Boehner disagreed about what the disagreement was about.

Reid said there had been an agreement at a White House meeting Thursday night to cut spending by about $38 billion as part of a bill to finance the government through the Sept. 30 end of the budget year.

He said Republicans also were demanding unspecified cuts in health services for lower income women that were unacceptable to Democrats.

"Republicans want to shut down our nation's government because they want to make it harder to get cancer screenings," he said. "They want to throw women under the bus."

Boehner said repeatedly that wasn't the case — it was spending cuts that divided two sides.


"Most of the policy issues have been dealt with, and the big fight is about spending," he said. "When will the White House and when will Senate Democrats get serious about cutting federal spending."

By midday Friday, 12 hours before the funding would run out, most federal employees had been told whether they had been deemed essential or would be temporarily laid off in the event of a shutdown.

The military, mail carriers, air traffic controllers and border security guards would still be expected at work, although paychecks could be delayed.

National parks and forests would close, and taxpayers filing paper returns would not receive refunds during a shutdown.

Passports would be available in cases of emergencies only.

Obama canceled a scheduled Friday trip to Indianapolis — and a weekend family visit to Colonial Williamsburg in Virginia — and kept in touch with both Boehner and Reid.

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky sounded hopeful, predicting an agreement and saying, "I assure you, these are not unresolvable issues."

The House passed legislation on Thursday to keep the government running for another week while also cutting $12 billion in spending — and providing enough money for the Pentagon to operate through Sept. 30.

Boehner urged Obama to reconsider a veto threat.

That seemed unlikely, although Republicans and Democrats alike talked of trying once more to pass a stopgap bill if the larger agreement remained elusive.

Obama has already signed two of those interim bills, which included a total of $10 billion in spending cuts.

The standoff began several weeks ago, when the new Republican majority in the House passed legislation to cut $61 billion from federal spending and place numerous curbs on the government.

In the weeks since, the two sides have alternately negotiated and taken time out to pass interim measures.

Democrats said Republicans had effectively jettisoned numerous demands to block Environmental Protection Agency regulations aimed at polluters, a key stumbling block in negotiations for weeks.

Originally, Republicans wanted to ban federal funds for Planned Parenthood, a health care services provider that is also the nation's largest provider of abortions.

Federal funds may not be used to pay for abortions except in strictly regulated cases, but supporters of the ban said cutting off government funds for the organization — currently about $330 million a year — would make it harder for it to use its own money for the same purpose.

Democrats rejected the proposal in private talks. Officials in both parties said Republicans returned earlier in the week with a proposal to distribute federal funds for family planning and related health services to the states, rather than directly to Planned Parenthood and other organizations.

Democrats said they rejected that proposal, as well, and then refused to agree to allow a separate Senate vote on the issue as part of debate over any compromise bill.

Instead, they launched a sustained campaign at both ends of the Capitol to criticize Republicans.

"We'll not allow them to use women as pawns," said Sen. Patty Murray, a fourth-term lawmaker from Washington who doubles as head of the Democratic senatorial campaign committee.

For Congress and Obama there are even tougher struggles still ahead — over a Republican budget that would remake entire federal programs, and a vote to raise the nation's debt limit.

____

Associated Press writers Andrew Taylor, Alan Fram, Julie Pace and Ben Feller contributed to this story.

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on


74,918 Comments

  • keeo
    2325 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 43 users disliked this comment
    keeo Mon Mar 28, 2011 05:53 pm PDT Report Abuse
    Everyone's screaming for accountability for teachers. Well, more imperatively, we should DEMAND accountability from our legislators. Their hours spent with lobbyists (and the resulting money/voting that stems from this shady activity), their voting records, incomes, every cent of their benefits and pensions, and every corporation and special interest group which contributes to their campaigns - and how much is contributed, again comparing it to their voting - should be published in a VERY public place for all to see. You talk about being accountable for the results of your work? Washington and state politicians should be the first ones to answer for their actions. Make their jobs as transparent as glass, then sit back and watch them squirm like the worms they are.
  • guess
    3071 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 63 users disliked this comment
    guess Mon Mar 28, 2011 03:31 pm PDT Report Abuse
    can't be to frigging important since the congress took an 8 day break and their easter break is coming up,lol,what a joke these people are.
  • patri8
    6155 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 143 users disliked this comment
    patri8 Sat Mar 12, 2011 05:45 am PST Report Abuse
    They can play with our benefits, but why is it I have not heard a word about Congress cutting theirs? It may be the tip of the iceberg, but it would be a start if they would pay for their own health care, like we do, and set up a retirement plan for themselves that better resembles our choices -- instead of simply taking all they can from us at no expense to themselves. A pay cut wouldn't hurt things either.
  • Bigmart
    509 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 9 users disliked this comment
    Bigmart Thu Mar 10, 2011 04:53 pm PST Report Abuse
    Its time we as Americans take back our country. The world has changed. We are in trade with the world, not just the states.

    I can remember when we looked to our government to make changes for us, now we look to see what changes they have made on their own, without the support of the American poeple.

    It seems to me that they are looking at one thing, their pockets. What is good for them at the cost of the American people.

    Where has our industry gone? It has gone where the Government decides to send it, and I believe it is going to what ever country pads the fattest pocket. Our government no longer looks after the US companies.

    I for one am getting tired of living on the shirt tails of our politicians. Can anyone tell me when our vote actually accounted for something?

    Why do we spend such a high price for foreign oil? Shouldn't our government be buying from the lowest bidders instead of who pads the deepest pocket? The high cost of foreign comes out of my pocket, your pocket, not the governments.

    I think its time that we the people take back our country from the political leaders with the fat bellies.
  • Bender
    6882 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 185 users disliked this comment
    Bender Thu Mar 10, 2011 02:22 am PST Report Abuse
    Its time! Time for these scum bag politicians to feel our pain and take a massive pay cut plus stopping all the lobbiests bribes.
  • cass
    15489 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 448 users disliked this comment
    cass Wed Mar 09, 2011 07:56 pm PST Report Abuse
    Cut the benefits of the politicians. Let the people vote on your wages!
  • Gregg
    13604 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 402 users disliked this comment
    Gregg Tue Mar 08, 2011 02:23 pm PST Report Abuse
    the congressmen dont seem to have any problem with spending when it comes to their salaries, benefits and retirement
  • Mike
    14599 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 452 users disliked this comment
    Mike Tue Mar 08, 2011 02:01 pm PST Report Abuse
    It would be nice & a show of leadership if the first 13% cut was congressional & executive branch salaries. I know it would not be a large sum, but it would show leadership. While they are at it
    they might reign in their pension & medical costs too. 4 or 8 years to get a pension for life is too sweet of a deal.
  • Joe
    11619 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 360 users disliked this comment
    Joe Tue Mar 08, 2011 08:21 pm PST Report Abuse
    If they want to cut spending, why don't they start with their own incomes. They have cut out pay raises for those who are on Medicare and disability the last two years but have continued to give themselves major pay raises. If they really want to start to fix things they need to be willing to take a hit in the wallet themselves.
  • hellshade
    518 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 12 users disliked this comment
    hellshade Fri Mar 04, 2011 03:42 am PST Report Abuse
    and when exactly are congress and the rest of the goverment going to take some cuts. how come no pay cut for congress? or a cut to thier pensions? it seems it's just fine when corporations and businesses can cut a persons pay and benefits in a bad economy but i don't see the politicians or the rich giving up @#$%. all they do is take from the little guy....

Post a Comment

Sign in to post a comment, or Sign up for a free account.